Early municipal bacteriology in Brighton, Aberdeen and Bristol: blessing or burden?

In contrast to the idea that bacteriology was introduced as a tool for the diagnosis and management of the individual patient, this review highlights the work of the municipal bacteriological laboratory in the United Kingdom to illustrate how bacteriological laboratories were introduced as means to control community epidemic disease. Using the examples of municipal laboratories in Brighton, Bristol and Aberdeen, it shows how public health considerations of community infectious diseases such as diphtheria and typhoid dominated the early development and workload of the municipal laboratory, rather than examination of patients with pathological states of uncertain aetiology. It argues that this public health focus of the Medical Officer of Health limited the range of diagnostic tests carried out in such laboratories for over two decades. The growing number of pathogenic microbes being discovered in the late 19th century appears to have had little impact on the tests being carried out in the municipal laboratory. Municipal bacteriological facilities in three towns, a central municipal laboratory (in Brighton), a central university pathological department (Aberdeen) or a combination of both (Bristol) all provided the same limited set of tests. This restricted set of bacteriological examinations is likely to have diminished the value and status of bacteriology in what should have been a period of increasing scope.