Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples
Published on: April 25, 2025
Automated versus manual audit in the emergency department
Steven Doherty1, Lin Davis, Paul Leschke
1Rural Clinical School, University of Newcastle, Tamworth, Australia. Steven.Doherty@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au
Insights
Automated form processing (AFP) systems like TELEform overestimate clinical indicator compliance in pediatric emergency medicine. Manual audits reveal significant discrepancies, highlighting the need to validate automated data against traditional methods.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Health Informatics
- Pediatric Care
Background:
- Accurate data collection is crucial for assessing clinical performance in pediatric emergency departments.
- Automated form processing (AFP) offers potential efficiency gains but requires validation.
- Clinical indicators (CIs) are key metrics for evaluating care quality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare data accuracy between automated form processing (AFP) and manual data collection for clinical indicators (CIs) in pediatric emergency medicine.
- To evaluate the reliability of TELEform, an AFP system, against traditional manual audits.
- To identify discrepancies in CI compliance reporting between automated and manual methods.
Main Methods:
- A manual audit was conducted on pediatric patients with common conditions (croup, asthma, bronchiolitis, head injury, gastroenteritis).
- Data from 16 CIs were collected for 127 patients via manual audit and compared with data from the TELEform AFP system.
- Patient data were identified using ICD 9 coding.
Main Results:
- TELEform data, available for only 24 patients, overestimated CI compliance by 17% (90.6%) compared to manual audits (73.5%).
- Manual audits showed significantly higher compliance (92.5%) when clinical guidelines were integrated into records versus when they were not (51.3%).
- A substantial difference in patient data availability existed between the two methods.
Conclusions:
- Automated form processing (AFP) systems, such as TELEform, can overestimate emergency department performance regarding CI compliance.
- Healthcare facilities utilizing AFP tools must establish validation processes linking automated data to traditional auditing methods.
- Manual auditing remains essential for accurate assessment of clinical performance and guideline adherence in pediatric emergency settings.
Purpose:
The purpose of this paper is to compare data collected by automated form processing with manual data collection for clinical indicators (CIs) in paediatric emergency medicine.
Design/Methodology/Approach:
Paediatric patients presenting with croup, asthma, bronchiolitis, head injury and gastroenteritis in August 2006 were identified by ICD 9 coding and a traditional manual audit was performed by two data collectors. Data were collected on a total of 16 CIs for these five illnesses. Manual audit data were then compared to information collected for this same patient population using TELEform, an automated forms processing (AFP) system that had been employed for over two years.
Findings:
Teleform data were only available for 24 patients compared to information for 127 patients identified by ICD 9 coding and manual audit. Teleform data overestimated compliance with clinical guidelines by 17 percent giving an overall departmental agreement with CIs of 90.6 percent compared to 73.5 percent in the manual audit. Additionally, manual audit demonstrated that when the clinical guideline was incorporated into the clinical record, compliance was 92.5 percent compared to 51.3 percent when it was not.
Originality/Value:
This single center study demonstrates that data collected by AFP such as TELEform, overestimate emergency department performance regarding CIs compliance. Departments that use automated data collection tools need to establish relationships between such data and data collected via more traditional auditing methods.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation