Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026
Translational Rabbit Model of Chronic Cardiac Pacing
Published on: January 6, 2023
Long-term results of high vs. normal impedance ventricular leads on actual (Real-Life) pacemaker generator longevity
Kakhaber Etsadashvili1, Florian Hintringer, Markus Stühlinger
1Clinical Department of Cardiology, Medical University Innsbruck Anichstrasse, Innsbruck, Austria. ekt_guli@yahoo.com
Aim:
The long-term effects of high impedance vs. standard impedance pacing leads on actual generator longevity were studied.
Methods And Results:
In 40 patients (21 females, age 73 +/- 13 years) with standard dual-chamber pacemaker indication, bipolar standard impedance ventricular leads and high-impedance leads were implanted in a randomized fashion. Identical pacemaker generators and atrial pacing leads were implanted in all patients. Patients were observed during a mean follow-up of 89.8 +/- 8.8 months before pacemaker replacement. Initially, the patients who received the high-impedance leads had a lower current drain as compared with standard pacing impedance leads, and the estimated pacemaker longevity was significantly prolonged, too. But this pattern disappeared after 6 years of follow-up, and finally the actual pacemaker generators' replacement time was 86.7 +/- 6.8 months in standard impedance lead group vs. 91.2 +/- 10.3 months in high-impedance lead group (P = 0.17).
Conclusion:
Implantation of high pacing impedance leads for ventricular stimulation does not result in a benefit with respect to pacemaker longevity as compared with standard impedance leads.
