[Indications for sonography and follow-up studies. Initial results of a prospective study]

Ultrasonic examinations of the abdomen may result in expensive secondary imaging examinations. This prospective study was conducted in collaboration with the Zentralinstitut Köln. The first aim of our study was to compare the results of abdominal sonography in three different patient groups: The first group was comprised of patients referred for a medical check-up, the second group of patients referred because of upper abdominal pain and the third group of patients with generalized atherosclerosis. The second aim was to correlate sonographic findings (classified in three degrees of severity), with subsequently induced diagnostic procedures in the three groups. 2719 patients were enrolled, 2393 (88%) in group 1, 286 (11%) in group 2 and 40 (1%) in group 3. A total of 1792 abnormal findings were diagnosed. 65.6% of the findings in group 1, 65.7% in group 2 and 88% in group 3 were abnormal. Up to now, the findings led to a nearly equal number of subsequent diagnostic procedures in groups 1 and 2. The preliminary results show that abdominal sonography may be as effective in patients for a check-up as in patients referred because of a well-defined indication. Patients with defined abdominal symptoms show more abnormal sonographic findings than patients on a check-up. Higher costs resulting from subsequent examinations deserve critical assessment in the individual patient.