Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Kaplan-Meier Approach

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...

Censoring Survival Data

Censoring Survival Data

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different reasons...

Actuarial Approach

Actuarial Approach

The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Hearing loss and executive functions - results from a population-based cohort study.

PloS one·2026

Same author

Immunoadsorption Versus Sham Treatment for Post-COVID Syndrome: A Randomised Sham-Controlled Crossover Trial.

The Lancet regional health. Europe·2026

Same author

Accuracy and precision of continuous, non-invasive blood pressure devices: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Anaesthesia·2026

Same author

Amblyopia and strabismus: Psychosocial characteristics - results from the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS).

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie·2026

Same author

Ultrasound-Facilitated, Catheter-Directed Fibrinolysis for Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

The New England journal of medicine·2026

Same author

Increased albuminuria is highly prevalent in the general population: prevalence of CKD in the Gutenberg Health Study.

Clinical kidney journal·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Estimating completeness in cancer registries--comparing capture-recapture methods in a simulation study.

Irene Schmidtmann¹

¹Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany. schmidtm@imbei.uni-mainz.de

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift

|December 11, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Cancer registry completeness is crucial for data quality. This study introduces a multi-state model and evaluates capture-recapture methods, finding most underestimate true cancer case numbers.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

Epidemiology
Biostatistics
Health Informatics

Background:

Cancer registries are vital for epidemiological research and cancer control.
Assessing the completeness of cancer registration is essential for data quality and representativeness.
Existing methods for estimating completeness have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

To present a novel multi-state model simulating the cancer diagnosis and treatment process.
To evaluate the performance of various capture-recapture methods for estimating cancer registry completeness.
To compare the validity and reliability of different completeness estimation techniques.

Main Methods:

Development of a multi-state model incorporating states for "incident tumour", "death", and various healthcare contacts.
Simulation of cancer diagnosis, treatment, and notification processes using derived transition intensities.
Application of several capture-recapture methods to simulated data with known "true" case numbers and registrations.

Main Results:

All investigated capture-recapture estimators tended to underestimate cancer registry completeness.
A modified DCN method and a specific log-linear model provided relatively accurate completeness estimates.
Other methods showed significant variability or substantial underestimation of completeness.

Conclusions:

The proposed multi-state model offers a framework for simulating and assessing cancer registry completeness.
Capture-recapture methods vary in their accuracy, with some significantly underestimating completeness.
Careful selection of methods is crucial for reliable assessment of cancer registry data quality.