Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026
05:58
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
Published on: August 29, 2018
Search time critically depends on irrelevant subset size in visual search
Jeroen S Benjamins1, Ignace T C Hooge, Jacco C van Elst
1Helmholtz Instituut, Universiteit Utrecht, Experimental Psychology, Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.benjamins@nin.knaw.nl
Vision Research
|December 11, 2008
Summary
Visual search performance is surprisingly slowed by a small percentage (5%) of irrelevant items that differ by two features from the target. This suggests covert visual analysis, not just set size, impacts search efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Visual Perception
Background:
- The human visual system processes vast sensory input, necessitating selective attention and discarding irrelevant information.
- Visual search literature lacks clarity on how performance is affected by items differing by one feature (1F set) versus two features (2F set) from the target.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of varying percentages of two-feature (2F) non-targets on visual search behavior.
- To determine the contribution of 2F non-targets to search efficiency and understand underlying mechanisms.
Main Methods:
- Systematically manipulated the percentage of 2F non-targets in visual search displays.
- Measured search times and analyzed saccadic eye movements in observers searching for a target within a 1F set.
Main Results:
- Contrary to expectations, search time increased significantly when displays contained 5% 2F non-targets.
- This effect was independent of the overall set size and not explained by saccade target selection.
- Longer search times at 5% 2F non-targets may stem from covert visual analysis processes.
Conclusions:
- Visual search performance is critically dependent on the proportion of irrelevant 2F non-targets.
- A small percentage of 2F non-targets can unexpectedly impair search efficiency, possibly due to covert attentional processes.
