Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Refining RDoC Using Individual-Level Task fMRI Factor Models Reveals Reproducible and Clinically Relevant Brain-Wide Motifs.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Telehealth Versus In-Person Caregiver-Mediated Behavioral Treatment for Challenging Behaviors in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Protocol for COACH (Caregiver Outreach for Autism Coaching at Home) Randomized Controlled Trial.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

Training Clinicians in Private Practice in Family-Based Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Online Approaches.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Family vs Individual Treatment for Children With Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry·2026
Same author

Randomized feasibility trial of tele-yoga versus in-person yoga for treating chronic musculoskeletal pain in veterans.

BMC complementary medicine and therapies·2026
Same author

Stanford neuromodulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized controlled trial confirming efficacy, and an EEG study providing insight into mechanism of action and a potentially predictive biomarker of efficacy.

World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)·2026
Same journal

Bayesian evaluation for latent variable models: A tutorial on computing information criteria and bayes factors with the r package bleval.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A stochastic block prior for clustering in graphical models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Three-level vector autoregressive models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Scaling cognitive modeling to big data: A deep learning approach to studying individual differences in evidence accumulation model parameters.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Best practices in multilevel modeling for within-cluster group comparisons: An evaluation of coding strategies reflecting group composition and heterogeneity.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A unified framework for psychometrics in experimental psychology: The standardized generalized hierarchical factor model.

Psychological methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Causal inference in randomized experiments with mediational processes.

Booil Jo1

  • 1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. booil@stanford.edu

Psychological Methods
|December 17, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study integrates structural equation modeling (SEM) and principal stratification (PS) for causal inference. The proposed cross-model translation (CMT) approach shows that identifying assumptions, not modeling frameworks, drive practical differences in randomized experiments.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Causal Inference
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Principal Stratification (PS) are established methods for analyzing intermediate outcomes in randomized experiments.
  • These approaches have historically developed independently, limiting potential synergistic insights.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To bridge the gap between SEM and PS methodologies in causal inference.
  • To introduce a Cross-Model Translation (CMT) approach for parameter exchange between SEM and PS models.

Main Methods:

  • Developed the Cross-Model Translation (CMT) approach to translate parameter estimates between PS and SEM models.
  • Utilized Monte Carlo simulations to examine the relationship between PS and SEM under specific identifying assumptions.

Main Results:

  • Parameter translation between PS and SEM is feasible based on their conceptual links, even without specific identifying assumptions.
  • Simulations clarified the interplay between the two approaches under various identifying assumptions.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of identifying assumptions is more critical for practical causal inference than the specific modeling framework (SEM or PS).
  • The CMT approach offers a unified framework for jointly considering SEM and PS, highlighting shared inferential challenges.