Cost-utility analysis of thrombolytic therapy
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 27, 2013
M L Simoons1, J Vos, L L Martens
1Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Insights
Thrombolytic therapy significantly reduces mortality and increases life years gained in heart attack patients. This cost-effective treatment offers favorable outcomes compared to conventional methods, making it a valuable cardiovascular therapy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Economics
Background:
- Thrombolytic therapy is a crucial treatment for acute myocardial infarction.
- Assessing the long-term cost-effectiveness of thrombolysis is essential for clinical and economic decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the 3- to 5-year cost-effectiveness of intracoronary streptokinase compared to conventional therapy.
- To evaluate the impact of thrombolytic therapy on mortality, life years gained, and healthcare costs.
Main Methods:
- A randomized analysis of 533 patients comparing conventional therapy with intracoronary streptokinase.
- Follow-up data collected over 3 to 5 years, including mortality, costs, and quality of life adjustments.
- Economic evaluation using discounted future costs and quality-adjusted life years.
Main Results:
- Thrombolytic therapy reduced 3-year mortality from 22% to 14%.
- Average gain in life years was 3.4 years, with higher gains for anterior (5.1 years) versus inferior (1.6 years) wall infarction.
- Additional lifetime costs per life year gained were favorable (ECU 2940 overall), comparing well with other cardiovascular therapies.
Conclusions:
- Intracoronary streptokinase is a highly cost-effective intervention for myocardial infarction.
- The economic benefits justify wider application, irrespective of economic constraints.
- Thrombolytic therapy does not significantly increase the need for subsequent procedures like bypass surgery or PTCA.
Abstract:
An analysis of the cost-effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy was performed, based on 3- to 5-year follow-up data, from 533 patients randomized to receive conventional therapy or intracoronary streptokinase. At the 3-year follow-up, mortality was 22% in the former group and 14% after thrombolysis. The estimated average gain in life years by thrombolytic therapy was 3.4, whereas this figure was only 1.6 years in patients with inferior wall infarction, and 5.1 years in patients with anterior wall infarction. The lifetime costs for conventional therapy, estimated as ECU 15,110, were increased by ECU 5530 when thrombolytic therapy was applied, including direct treatment costs and the additional costs of extra coronary bypass surgery and PTCA. After correction for quality of life, and discounting future costs and future events at 5% year-1, the additional costs for each life year were ECU 2940 for all patients treated. This was broken down into ECU 7030 and ECU 2000 for patients with inferior and anterior wall infarction respectively. These figures compare favourably with other modes of cardiovascular therapy. Thrombolytic therapy does not substantially increase the need for bypass surgery or PTCA. It is very cost-effective, and its application should not be limited by economic resources.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

