Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Desirable Characteristics in Others01:26

Desirable Characteristics in Others

Various factors, including the type of relationship, gender, and duration of the relationship, influence the perception of desirable characteristics in others. While certain traits such as trustworthiness, cooperativeness, agreeableness, and extraversion are universally valued across all relationships, other characteristics are context-dependent and gain prominence based on specific relational dynamics.Universal and Context-Dependent TraitsTrustworthiness and cooperativeness are fundamental...
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perspectives of Children, Parents, and Healthcare Providers on Outcomes after Anesthesia for Surgery: An International Mixed Methods Stakeholder Engagement Study from the Pediatric Perioperative Outcomes Group.

Anesthesiology·2026
Same author

The Ideal Trial: Defining Causal Estimands that Balance Relevance and Feasibility in Target Trial Emulations and Actual Randomized Trials.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

"Identifying variables that independently predict…" is not a well-defined research task.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2025
Same author

Causal Machine Learning Methods and Use of Cross-Fitting in Settings With High-Dimensional Confounding.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Common pitfalls of perioperative clinical trials in response to <i>'Barriers and enablers to recruiting participants within paediatric perioperative and anaesthetic settings: lessons learned from a trial of melatonin versus midazolam in the premedication of anxious children (the MAGIC trial)'</i>.

BJA open·2025
Same author

Chewing Gum and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Reply.

Anesthesiology·2025
Same journal

Perspectives in Pediatric Ambulatory Anesthesia: Part 4-Evolving Solutions in Pediatric Ambulatory Anesthesia: From Registries to a Learning Health System Approach.

Paediatric anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Melatonin in Preschool-Aged Pediatric Surgical Patients.

Paediatric anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Respiratory Events and Procedure Interruptions During Pediatric Bronchoscopy and Suspension Laryngoscopy: A Secondary Analysis Comparing Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil-Based Anesthesia.

Paediatric anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Intraoperative Cardiac Events During Pediatric Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Under Anesthesia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Paediatric anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

A Triple-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Hydromorphone vs. Fentanyl for Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy.

Paediatric anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Intraoperative Lidocaine Infusion Therapy and Neurophysiological Monitoring in Adolescents Undergoing Idiopathic Scoliosis Correction: A Supplemental Analysis of a Prospective Study.

Paediatric anaesthesia·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

A Novel Single Animal Motor Function Tracking System Using Simple, Readily Available Software
08:22

A Novel Single Animal Motor Function Tracking System Using Simple, Readily Available Software

Published on: August 31, 2018

What a reviewer wants.

Andrew J Davidson1, John B Carlin

  • 1Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. andrew.davidson@rch.org.au

Paediatric Anaesthesia
|December 17, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding reviewer expectations is key for authors to improve research papers and study design. Clear research questions, valid methods, and appropriate statistical analysis are crucial for scientific validity and successful peer review.

More Related Videos

Preparation of High-Quality Fermented Fish Product
05:17

Preparation of High-Quality Fermented Fish Product

Published on: August 23, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

A Novel Single Animal Motor Function Tracking System Using Simple, Readily Available Software
08:22

A Novel Single Animal Motor Function Tracking System Using Simple, Readily Available Software

Published on: August 31, 2018

Preparation of High-Quality Fermented Fish Product
05:17

Preparation of High-Quality Fermented Fish Product

Published on: August 23, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Scientific writing and research methodology.
  • Peer review processes in academia.
  • Statistical analysis and reporting standards.

Background:

  • Authors must understand reviewer criteria for effective scientific communication.
  • The research question is paramount, requiring clarity, relevance, and originality.
  • Scientific validity hinges on aligning methods with the research question and results with conclusions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate key elements reviewers prioritize in scientific manuscripts.
  • To guide authors in designing robust research and writing clear papers.
  • To highlight common areas of criticism, such as statistical analysis and significance.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of common reviewer feedback and expectations.
  • Identification of critical components of a research study (question, methods, conclusions).
  • Examination of statistical reporting issues, including P-values and significance.

Main Results:

  • Reviewers prioritize a well-defined, relevant, and original research question.
  • Scientific validity requires methods to match the research aim and conclusions to results.
  • Statistical analysis, particularly P-values and significance, is a frequent point of critique.

Conclusions:

  • Adhering to established reporting guidelines significantly aids reviewers.
  • Clear communication of research aims and valid methodology enhances paper acceptance.
  • Understanding reviewer perspectives improves both research quality and publication success.