Related Experiment Videos
The 'rule out lupus' rheumatology consultation: clinical outcomes and perspectives
D J Wallace1, E Schwartz, H Chi-Lin
1Department of Medicine/Division of Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine. Los Angeles, California and Specialty Laboratories, Santa Monica. California.
Abstract:
Forty-four female patients who met the following criteria were studied. All were referred for rheumatology consultation because of symptoms and a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) to rule out lupus. None fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at the time of the initial visit. All had a normal or noncontributory complete blood count, urinalysis, and blood panel. They lacked antideoxyribonucleic acid, anti-Smith (anti-Sm), antiribonucleoprotein (anti-RNP), anti-Ro, anti-La, and antiscleroderma 70 (anti-Scl-70) antibodies, and none had rheumatoid factor, elevated creatine phosphokinase levels, or decreased C3 complement or C4 complement values. We performed additional tests or procedures in an effort to improve diagnostic accuracy. Nine of 44 (20%) had a negative ANA on retesting. All patients were tested for antiribosomal P, antineuronal, antihistone-(H2A-H2B)/deoxyribonucleic acid complex antibody, anti-smooth muscle antibody and antithyroid antibodies, as well as Westergren sedimentation rate. Anticardiolipin antibody, serum protein electrophoresis, bone scanning, or skin biopsies with or without lupus band testing were obtained as clinically indicated. At the 6-month follow-up, 19 patients (43%) fulfilled the ACR criteria for SLE, 14 (32%) fulfilled the ACR criteria for fibromyalgia only, 4 (9%) had seronegative rheumatoid arthritis, 1 (2%) had myasthenia gravis, and 6 (14%) remained undiagnosed; 18/19 diagnosed with SLE had an additional antibody or positive diagnostic test listed above versus 3/25 without SLE (p<0.0001). Additional laboratory and diagnostic testing beyond the routine ANA profile correlated with the evolving diagnosis in 86% of the patients at 6 months.
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Nephrotic Syndrome II : Assessment and Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...