Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Air pollution from livestock farms and lung function decline in neighboring residents over 7 years.

Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

Assessing ammonia deposition patterns and emission reduction scenarios in a livestock-dense region of the Netherlands using a high resolution dispersion model.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2025
Same author

Exposure-response relationships for platinum salt sensitization in precious metal refinery workers: a 16-yr retrospective study.

Annals of work exposures and health·2025
Same author

A coaching approach to strengthen farm management teams to reduce antimicrobial use in Dutch high usage pig farms: a 2 year intervention study.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2024
Same author

Update on occupational allergy, including asthma, to soluble platinum salts.

Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology·2024
Same author

Comparing human and animal antimicrobial usage: a critical appraisal of the indicators used is needed.

JAC-antimicrobial resistance·2024

Related Experiment Videos

Guidelines to evaluate human observational studies for quantitative risk assessment.

Jelle Vlaanderen1, Roel Vermeulen, Dick Heederik

  • 1Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Division Environmental Epidemiology, Utrecht University, Jenalaan 18d, Utrecht, the Netherlands. j.j.vlaanderen@uu.nl

Environmental Health Perspectives
|December 17, 2008
PubMed
Summary

New guidelines help evaluate human observational studies (HOS) for quantitative risk assessment (QRA). These guidelines identify and rank studies on benzene exposure and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) quality for reliable risk assessment.

Keywords:
benzeneepidemiologyevidence-based medicinehuman observational studiesquantitative risk assessment

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health
  • Toxicology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Evaluating human observational studies (HOS) is critical for quantitative risk assessment (QRA).
  • High-quality exposure assessment within HOS is a key factor for reliable QRA.
  • Standardized methods are needed to assess HOS quality for QRA.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop guidelines for evaluating HOS for QRA.
  • To apply these guidelines to studies examining benzene exposure and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Main Methods:

  • A three-tiered framework with 20 evaluation criteria was developed.
  • The framework specifically focused on the quality of exposure assessment in HOS.
  • The framework was applied to evaluate seven HOS on benzene and AML.

Main Results:

  • Five of seven evaluated HOS were deemed suitable for QRA.
  • Studies were ranked based on the quality of their design, conduct, and reporting.
  • The framework successfully identified and ranked studies relevant to benzene and AML.

Conclusions:

  • The developed guidelines provide a transparent and harmonized approach to evaluating HOS for QRA.
  • These guidelines enable the identification and quality-based ranking of studies for QRA.
  • Applying these guidelines enhances the weight of evidence assessment in QRA.