Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
The neural correlates of third-party punishment
Joshua W Buckholtz1, Christopher L Asplund, Paul E Dux
1Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
Brain activity in emotional processing regions predicts punishment severity in legal decision-making. The right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is crucial for assessing perpetrator responsibility in third-party punishment scenarios.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Legal Psychology
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Legal decision-making involves assessing responsibility and determining punishment by impartial third parties.
- Understanding the neural basis of these functions is crucial for legal and psychological insights.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the neural underpinnings of third-party legal decision-making.
- To differentiate the brain regions involved in assessing perpetrator responsibility versus determining punishment severity.
Main Methods:
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to scan subjects.
- Participants evaluated criminal scenarios varying in perpetrator responsibility and crime severity to determine appropriate punishment.
Main Results:
- Activity in affective processing regions (amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex) correlated with punishment magnitude.
- Activity in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex differentiated scenarios based on criminal responsibility.
Conclusions:
- Affective processing regions are key to determining punishment severity in legal contexts.
- The right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plays a significant role in assessing responsibility for third-party punishment.
- A common neural mechanism in the prefrontal cortex may support both legal decision-making and economic norm enforcement.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
09:40Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
Published on: November 15, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Punishment
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Dark Triad and Person Perception
Attribution Theory
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes