Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
Published on: November 9, 2018
Probability assessment with response times and confidence in perception and knowledge.
William M Petrusic1, Joseph V Baranski
1Department of Psychology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6. bill_petrusic@carleton.ca
This study found that while people can categorize their decision times, confidence ratings are better predictors of decision accuracy than response time (RT) categorization. Confidence does not appear to arise from simply scaling decision time.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Decision Science
Background:
- Confidence judgments are crucial for metacognition.
- The relationship between decision time and confidence is debated.
- Previous research suggests decision time might influence confidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether confidence arises from scaling decision time.
- To compare the metacognitive properties of response time (RT) categorization and confidence ratings.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed perceptual and general knowledge tasks.
- They categorized their decision times (Slow to Fast) and provided confidence ratings (50% to 100%).
- Probability assessment analyses examined over/underconfidence, calibration, and resolution.
Main Results:
- Response time (RT) categorization showed a "hard-easy" effect similar to confidence ratings.
- Confidence ratings provided significantly better decision resolution than RT categorization.
- Subjective RT categorization yielded superior probability indices compared to objective RT scaling.
Conclusions:
- Findings do not support the hypothesis that confidence is derived from scaling decision time.
- Confidence ratings are more effective than RT categorization for metacognitive assessment.
- Decision time and confidence are distinct metacognitive signals.
Related Concept Videos
The Availability Heuristic
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Probability in Statistics
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Binomial Probability Distribution
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...
Confidence Intervals
A confidence...

