Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model
Published on: May 31, 2017
Tensile mechanical properties of the perinatal and pediatric PMHS osteoligamentous cervical spine
Jason F Luck1, Roger W Nightingale, Andre M Loyd
1Injury & Orthopaedic Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 136 Hudson Hall Box 90281 Durham, NC 27708-0281, USA.
Insights
This study investigated pediatric cervical spine biomechanics using post-mortem human subjects. Findings show increased stiffness and strength with age, with juvenile animal models accurately estimating stiffness but not strength.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Pediatric Traumatology
Background:
- Pediatric cervical spine biomechanics are under-researched due to limited post-mortem human subject (PMHS) availability.
- Existing data often relies on scaled adult data or juvenile animal studies, leaving a significant knowledge gap.
- Understanding pediatric cervical spine properties is crucial for injury prevention and treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize the tensile biomechanical properties of the pediatric cervical spine.
- To compare the properties of upper (O-C2) and lower (C4-C7) cervical spine segments.
- To evaluate the age-related changes in pediatric cervical spine strength and stiffness.
Main Methods:
- Tested 18 pediatric PMHS head-neck complexes (20 weeks gestation to 14 years) in tension.
- Performed non-destructive and destructive tensile tests on whole spines and segmented regions (O-C2, C4-C5, C6-C7).
- Analyzed tensile stiffness, ultimate strength, and load tolerance.
Main Results:
- Tensile stiffness of whole spines ranged from 5.3 to 70.1 N/mm.
- Perinatal/neonatal upper cervical spine ultimate strength was ~231 N; lower cervical spine was ~187-213 N.
- Lower cervical segments were stiffer and weaker than upper segments in older children.
- Stiffness and strength significantly increased with age.
- Juvenile animal surrogates estimated stiffness well but not strength.
Conclusions:
- Pediatric cervical spine properties change significantly with age.
- Upper cervical spine segments demonstrate greater tolerance than lower segments.
- Juvenile animal models may be insufficient for accurately predicting pediatric cervical spine injury tolerance.
Abstract:
Pediatric cervical spine biomechanics have been under-researched due to the limited availability of pediatric post-mortem human subjects (PMHS). Scaled data based on human adult and juvenile animal studies have been utilized to augment the limited pediatric PMHS data that exists. Despite these efforts, a significant void in pediatric cervical spine biomechanics remains. Eighteen PMHS osteoligamentous head-neck complexes ranging in age from 20 weeks gestational to 14 years were tested in tension. The tests were initially conducted on the whole cervical spine and then the spines were sectioned into three segments that included two lower cervical spine segments (C4-C5 and C6-C7) and one upper cervical spine segment (O-C2). After non-destructive tests were conducted, each segment was failed in tension. The tensile stiffness of the whole spines ranged from 5.3 to 70.1 N/mm. The perinatal and neonatal specimens had an ultimate strength for the upper cervical spine of 230.9 +/- 38.0 N and for the lower cervical spine of 212.8 +/- 60.9 and 187.1 +/- 39.4 N for the C4-C5 and C6-C7 segments, respectively. The lower cervical segments were significantly weaker and stiffer than the upper cervical spine segments in the older cohort. For the entire cohort of specimens, the stiffness of the upper cervical spine ranged from 7.1 to 199.0 N/mm. The tolerance ranged from 173.6 to 2960 N for the upper cervical spine and from 142 to 1757 N for the lower. There was a statistically significant increase in stiffness and strength with age. The results also suggest that juvenile animal surrogates estimate the stiffness of the human cervical spine fairly well; however, they may not provide accurate estimates of pediatric cervical spine strength.
Related Concept Videos
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity
Sutures of the Skull
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
