Tensile mechanical properties of the perinatal and pediatric PMHS osteoligamentous cervical spine

Jason F Luck1, Roger W Nightingale, Andre M Loyd

  • 1Injury & Orthopaedic Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 136 Hudson Hall Box 90281 Durham, NC 27708-0281, USA.

Stapp Car Crash Journal
|December 17, 2008
PubMed

Insights

This study investigated pediatric cervical spine biomechanics using post-mortem human subjects. Findings show increased stiffness and strength with age, with juvenile animal models accurately estimating stiffness but not strength.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Pediatric Traumatology

Background:

  • Pediatric cervical spine biomechanics are under-researched due to limited post-mortem human subject (PMHS) availability.
  • Existing data often relies on scaled adult data or juvenile animal studies, leaving a significant knowledge gap.
  • Understanding pediatric cervical spine properties is crucial for injury prevention and treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize the tensile biomechanical properties of the pediatric cervical spine.
  • To compare the properties of upper (O-C2) and lower (C4-C7) cervical spine segments.
  • To evaluate the age-related changes in pediatric cervical spine strength and stiffness.

Main Methods:

  • Tested 18 pediatric PMHS head-neck complexes (20 weeks gestation to 14 years) in tension.
  • Performed non-destructive and destructive tensile tests on whole spines and segmented regions (O-C2, C4-C5, C6-C7).
  • Analyzed tensile stiffness, ultimate strength, and load tolerance.

Main Results:

  • Tensile stiffness of whole spines ranged from 5.3 to 70.1 N/mm.
  • Perinatal/neonatal upper cervical spine ultimate strength was ~231 N; lower cervical spine was ~187-213 N.
  • Lower cervical segments were stiffer and weaker than upper segments in older children.
  • Stiffness and strength significantly increased with age.
  • Juvenile animal surrogates estimated stiffness well but not strength.

Conclusions:

  • Pediatric cervical spine properties change significantly with age.
  • Upper cervical spine segments demonstrate greater tolerance than lower segments.
  • Juvenile animal models may be insufficient for accurately predicting pediatric cervical spine injury tolerance.