Erratum to "Prediction of non-genotoxic carcinogenesis in rats using changes in gene expression following acute...

Carcinogenicity of chemicals can currently only be evaluated in 2-year rodent bioassays. Therefore, the development of early biomarkers for carcinogenesis would result in substantial savings in time and expense. The current study investigates whether early changes in gene expression may be developed as markers for cancer. Animals were treated for 1 or 5 days with either non-genotoxic carcinogens or non-carcinogens and gene expression was analyzed by quantitative PCR (qPCR).We tested two gene signatures previously reported to detect non-genotoxic carcinogens. Using one gene signature it was confirmed that 3/3 nongenotoxic carcinogens and 2/2 non-carcinogens are correctly identified with data from 1 or 5 days of dosing. In contrast an alternative signature correctly identified 0/3 and 2/3 nongenotoxic carcinogens at 1 and 5 days of treatment, respectively and 2/2 non-carcinogens at both time-points. Additionally, we evaluated a novel panel of putative biomarker genes, from the literature, many of which have roles in cell growth and division, including myc, cdc2 and mcm6. These genes were significantly induced by non-genotoxic carcinogens and not by non-carcinogens. Using the average fold-induction across this panel, 2/3 non-genotoxic carcinogens were detected on both day 1 and day 5. These data support the idea that acute changes in gene expression may provide biomarkers for non-genotoxic carcinogenesis but also highlight interesting differences in the sensitivities of distinct gene signatures.