Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

A Battery of Motor Tests in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Cerebral Palsy
Published on: November 3, 2016
The serial use of child neurocognitive tests: development versus practice effects
Peter D Slade1, Brenda D Townes, Gail Rosenbaum
1Expert Data Analysis for Doctors and Others, West Kirby, United Kingdom.
This study examined neurocognitive assessments in children, finding that practice effects varied over five years. Comparing raw and scaled scores helps differentiate developmental changes from learning effects in pediatric neurocognition.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Developmental Psychology
- Pediatric Health
Background:
- Serial neurocognitive assessments are crucial for tracking cognitive development and intervention effectiveness.
- Key factors influencing serial assessments include test-retest reliability, practice effects, and developmental maturation in children.
- Standard neurocognitive tests for children utilize age-corrected scaled scores to account for developmental changes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relative contributions of developmental effects and practice effects in serial neurocognitive assessments of children.
- To analyze practice effects over a 5-year period across eight different neurocognitive tests.
- To provide a method for estimating the interplay between maturation and learning in pediatric neurocognitive evaluation.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from 507 Portuguese children participating in a longitudinal dental amalgam study.
- Compared raw neurocognitive scores (reflecting both developmental and practice effects) with scaled scores (reflecting practice effects only).
- Employed simple regression equations to estimate individual retest scores based on initial test scores.
Main Results:
- Significant variability in practice effects was observed across eight neurocognitive tests over the 5-year study period.
- The comparison of raw versus scaled scores provided a framework for distinguishing developmental influences from practice-related learning.
- Regression equations were developed to predict retest scores, aiding in the interpretation of longitudinal neurocognitive data.
Conclusions:
- Practice effects in pediatric neurocognitive testing are variable and test-specific over extended periods.
- Comparing raw and scaled scores offers a practical approach to disentangle developmental maturation from practice effects in children.
- The findings support the use of age-corrected scores and provide tools for more accurate interpretation of serial neurocognitive data in pediatric research.
More Related Videos
08:05Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
Published on: June 30, 2020
10:02Event Related Potentials (ERPs) and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Published on: March 12, 2020