Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quality of surgery in oncological trials: the patient's perspective.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2025
Same author

Peritoneal resident macrophages constitute an immunosuppressive environment in peritoneal metastasized colorectal cancer.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Correction: The impact of digital health technologies on moral responsibility: a scoping review.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2025
Same author

A proposed framework of strategies to overcome challenges to surgical quality assurance in oncology trials (SQA-Onc.).

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2025
Same author

The effect of virtual reality therapy on pain and anxiety during wound care in adults: A systematic review.

Heliyon·2024
Same author

The impact of digital health technologies on moral responsibility: a scoping review.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Evaluating Flight Performance and Eye Movement Patterns Using Virtual Reality Flight Simulator
03:49

Evaluating Flight Performance and Eye Movement Patterns Using Virtual Reality Flight Simulator

Published on: May 19, 2023

Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators.

F J Carter1, M P Schijven, R Aggarwal

  • 1The Cuschieri Skills Centre, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, DD1 9SY.

Simulation in Healthcare : Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
|December 18, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A review of surgical simulators found a lack of rigorous validation studies. While some systems earned level 2 recommendations, more research is needed for effective skills training programs.

More Related Videos

The Immersive Cleveland Clinic Virtual Reality Shopping Platform for the Assessment of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
08:36

The Immersive Cleveland Clinic Virtual Reality Shopping Platform for the Assessment of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

Published on: July 28, 2022

Pioneering Patient-Specific Approaches for Precision Surgery Using Imaging and Virtual Reality
06:18

Pioneering Patient-Specific Approaches for Precision Surgery Using Imaging and Virtual Reality

Published on: April 5, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Evaluating Flight Performance and Eye Movement Patterns Using Virtual Reality Flight Simulator
03:49

Evaluating Flight Performance and Eye Movement Patterns Using Virtual Reality Flight Simulator

Published on: May 19, 2023

The Immersive Cleveland Clinic Virtual Reality Shopping Platform for the Assessment of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
08:36

The Immersive Cleveland Clinic Virtual Reality Shopping Platform for the Assessment of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

Published on: July 28, 2022

Pioneering Patient-Specific Approaches for Precision Surgery Using Imaging and Virtual Reality
06:18

Pioneering Patient-Specific Approaches for Precision Surgery Using Imaging and Virtual Reality

Published on: April 5, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Education and Training
  • Medical Simulation Validation
  • Endoscopic Surgery Skills Assessment

Background:

  • The European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) formed a Work Group for Evaluation and Implementation of Simulators and Skills Training Programmes.
  • This group aimed to address the need for validated surgical simulators in endoscopic surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and evaluate the existing validation evidence for surgical simulators.
  • To provide a consensus-based recommendation for different surgical simulation systems.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review of validation evidence for six surgical simulators was conducted.
  • Clinical guidelines criteria were used to rate the evidence for each simulator.
  • Simulators were categorized into laparoscopic general surgery and flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy systems.

Main Results:

  • Level 2 recommendations were achieved for a limited number of simulators.
  • A significant lack of published validation studies with rigorous methodology was identified.
  • The consensus focused on simulators available and widely used as of July 2004.

Conclusions:

  • There is a need for more robust validation of surgical simulators to ensure their effectiveness in skills training.
  • The EAES Work Group plans to regularly update these consensus guidelines.
  • Further research and development in surgical simulation technology are encouraged.