Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Infinium Assay for Large-scale SNP Genotyping Applications
Published on: November 19, 2013
A comprehensive evaluation of SNP genotype imputation
Michael Nothnagel1, David Ellinghaus, Stefan Schreiber
1Institute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany.
Genotype imputation methods like BEAGLE and MACH accurately predict individual genetic data for complex disease studies. These tools offer reliable performance, with BEAGLE and MACH being recommended for user-friendliness and efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Bioinformatics
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are crucial for understanding complex diseases.
- Genotype imputation enhances GWAS power by predicting genotypes at untyped loci using reference panels like HapMap.
- A comprehensive comparison of imputation methods using consistent genome-wide SNP data is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the performance of four publicly available genotype imputation programs: BEAGLE, IMPUTE, MACH, and PLINK.
- To assess imputation accuracy and efficacy across different genome-wide SNP datasets in a single population.
Main Methods:
- Utilized genome-wide SNP data from 449 German individuals.
- Genotyped individuals using Affymetrix 5.0 (500k), Affymetrix 6.0 (1,000k), and Illumina 550k SNP sets.
- Compared BEAGLE, IMPUTE, MACH, and PLINK for genotype imputation accuracy and imputation efficacy.
Main Results:
- HapMap-based imputation is powerful and reliable in a northern European population, even in complex regions like the MHC.
- All four programs demonstrated high accuracy in genotype predictions.
- Significant variation in imputation efficacy (number of SNPs imputed) was observed among the programs.
- BEAGLE, IMPUTE, and MACH showed similar accuracy-efficacy trade-offs, outperforming PLINK.
Conclusions:
- Genotype imputation using HapMap data is effective for genetic studies in European populations.
- BEAGLE and MACH are recommended for practical application due to their superior user-friendliness and lower memory requirements compared to IMPUTE.
- PLINK demonstrated poorer overall performance in this comparative analysis.
Related Concept Videos
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Principles of Pharmacogenetics: Types of Genetic Variants
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
