Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different reasons...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are observed.
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing New Therapies-Putting the Money Where the Need Is.

JAMA·2025
Same author

Proceedings From a National Summit on Workplace Mental Health and Well-being: A Focus on the Graduate Academic Environment.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2024
Same author

Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) in Severe Lower Extremity Trauma: Pooled Data from 7 Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Trials.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2024
Same author

Do Transtibial Amputations Outperform Amputations of the Hind- and Midfoot Following Severe Limb Trauma?: A Secondary Analysis of the OUTLET Study.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2024
Same author

The Future of Road Safety: Challenges and Opportunities.

The Milbank quarterly·2023
Same author

Activation and On-Scene Intervals for Severe Trauma EMS Interventions: An Analysis of the NEMSIS Database.

Prehospital emergency care·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Detecting Behavioral Deficits in Rats After Traumatic Brain Injury
07:54

Detecting Behavioral Deficits in Rats After Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: January 30, 2018

Managing the common problem of missing data in trauma studies.

Tessa Rue1, Hilaire J Thompson, Frederick P Rivara

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Journal of Nursing Scholarship : an Official Publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing
|December 20, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Managing missing data in trauma studies is crucial. Multiple imputation methods offer superior accuracy and precision compared to complete case analysis, reducing bias in findings.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Detecting Behavioral Deficits in Rats After Traumatic Brain Injury
07:54

Detecting Behavioral Deficits in Rats After Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: January 30, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Research
  • Trauma Care

Background:

  • Missing data is a common challenge in clinical studies, particularly in trauma research.
  • Inappropriate handling of missing data can introduce bias and compromise the validity of study findings.
  • Clear interpretation of study results necessitates a robust approach to managing missing data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To offer guidance on managing missing data in clinical trauma studies.
  • To enhance the validity of findings by minimizing bias.
  • To ensure reliable data for subsequent research and clinical application.

Main Methods:

  • An integrative review of biostatistics, medical, and nursing literature.
  • Utilized case exemplars from the National Study on the Costs and Outcomes of Trauma (NSCOT).
  • Demonstrated missing data analyses using multiple linear regression.

Main Results:

  • Multiple imputation generally yields more accurate and precise estimates than complete case analysis in trauma studies.
  • Multiple imputation can significantly reduce bias associated with missing data.
  • Sensitivity analyses, involving repeated analyses under various scenarios, can support further investigation.

Conclusions:

  • Clinicians must verify appropriate methods for handling missing data in trauma studies.
  • Failure to employ suitable missing data techniques may lead to biased study findings.
  • The presented stepwise approach for managing missing data is applicable to studies with similar data patterns.