Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate + error bound)
The...
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the Guinness...
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tuned interfacial hydrogen bonds for enhanced H<sub>2</sub> electrocatalysis kinetics on Ti<sub>2</sub>C MXenes.

Communications chemistry·2026
Same author

Differences in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake according to region of birth: findings from a cross-sectional survey in Sweden.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

SARS-CoV-2 infection as a trigger of type 2 diabetes in adults: a population-based cohort study in Sweden using a double negative control design.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Exploring the Structure and Chemistry of One-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Lepidocrocite TiO<sub>2</sub> at Atomic Resolution.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Toposelective on-surface synthesis of curved π-extended oligomers based on bowl-shaped aromatics.

Chemical science·2026
Same author

Contrast-enhanced CT-Nephrotoxic or not? A critical review of propensity-score-adjusted studies.

Journal of internal medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Variability in diagnostic accuracy can be estimated using simple population weighting.

Jonas Björk1, Anders Grubb, Ulf Nyman

  • 1Competence Centre for Clinical Research, Lund University Hospital, Barngatan 2, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden. jonas.bjork@skane.se

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|December 20, 2008
PubMed
Summary

The diagnostic accuracy of the 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation varies by population type. Population weighting helps assess this variability for better diagnostic test reporting.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Diagnostic test evaluation
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • The diagnostic accuracy of quantitative tests depends on the population studied.
  • Simple weighted averages can assess accuracy variability across different populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation.
  • To assess accuracy in distinguishing early-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) from later stages.
  • To estimate accuracy in different population distributions using population weighting.

Main Methods:

  • The study evaluated 850 referred patients for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) determination.
  • The 4-variable MDRD Study equation was used as a diagnostic test.
  • Population weighting was applied to mimic screening populations.

Main Results:

  • Estimated diagnostic accuracy of the MDRD equation varied significantly across population types.
  • Sensitivity ranged from 82% to 97%, and specificity from 67% to 93%.

Conclusions:

  • Diagnostic accuracy reports should include estimates of variability for different population distributions.
  • Population weighting is a valuable method for assessing diagnostic accuracy variability.