Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing a Bone-Mimicking Microenvironment: Surface Coating Method for Investigating Bone Remodeling <i>in Vitro</i>.

ACS biomaterials science & engineering·2025
Same author

Differential proteomics profile of microcapillary networks in response to sound pattern-driven local cell density enhancement.

Biomaterials and biosystems·2024
Same author

Osteochondral explants for diarthrodial joint diseases: bridging the gap between bench and bedside.

European cells & materials·2022
Same author

The production and application of bacterial exopolysaccharides as biomaterials for bone regeneration.

Carbohydrate polymers·2022
Same author

Evaluation of the influence of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), platelet lysate (PL) and mechanical loading on chondrogenesis in vitro.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Sodium hyaluronate supplemented culture medium combined with joint-simulating mechanical loading improves chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells.

European cells & materials·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Direct and Indirect Culture Methods for Studying Biodegradable Implant Materials In Vitro
14:49

Direct and Indirect Culture Methods for Studying Biodegradable Implant Materials In Vitro

Published on: April 15, 2022

Degradable polymeric materials for osteosynthesis: tutorial.

D Eglin1, M Alini

  • 1Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering Program, AO Research Institute, CH-7270 Davos, Switzerland. david.eglin@aofoundation.org

European Cells & Materials
|December 23, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Biodegradable polymer devices show promise for osteosynthesis, excelling in low-load applications. Further research and improved mechanical properties are needed for broader clinical use in bone repair.

More Related Videos

Fabrication of a Bioactive, PCL-based "Self-fitting" Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold
09:37

Fabrication of a Bioactive, PCL-based "Self-fitting" Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold

Published on: October 23, 2015

Fabrication of Mechanically Tunable and Bioactive Metal Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications
09:56

Fabrication of Mechanically Tunable and Bioactive Metal Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications

Published on: December 8, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Direct and Indirect Culture Methods for Studying Biodegradable Implant Materials In Vitro
14:49

Direct and Indirect Culture Methods for Studying Biodegradable Implant Materials In Vitro

Published on: April 15, 2022

Fabrication of a Bioactive, PCL-based "Self-fitting" Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold
09:37

Fabrication of a Bioactive, PCL-based "Self-fitting" Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold

Published on: October 23, 2015

Fabrication of Mechanically Tunable and Bioactive Metal Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications
09:56

Fabrication of Mechanically Tunable and Bioactive Metal Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications

Published on: December 8, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Polymer Chemistry

Background:

  • Current biodegradable polymeric implants for bone repair are designed as inert, supportive substitutes for bone tissue, mimicking metal implant designs.
  • These devices are currently successful in low or mild load-bearing applications for osteosynthesis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize the state of the art, recent developments, and advances in degradable polymer devices for osteosynthesis.
  • To highlight the limitations and future directions for biodegradable implants in bone fracture treatment.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on degradable polymers for osteosynthesis.
  • Analysis of the design principles, applications, and limitations of existing biodegradable implants.
  • Discussion of future trends incorporating cell-material interactions and cell therapy.

Main Results:

  • Biodegradable polymeric devices are effective in low or mild load-bearing situations for osteosynthesis.
  • A significant limitation is the lack of controlled prospective trials documenting efficacy for specific fracture patterns.
  • The choice between degradable and non-degradable devices requires careful consideration of patient factors and fracture type.

Conclusions:

  • Improvements in mechanical properties and degradation behavior are essential to expand the use of biodegradable osteosynthesis devices.
  • Future biodegradable implants will likely integrate knowledge of cell-material interactions and cell therapy for enhanced bone regeneration.
  • Careful patient and fracture assessment is crucial when selecting between degradable and non-degradable osteosynthesis options.