Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using Importance Sampling to Estimate <i>p</i>-values in All-Subset Meta-Analysis, with Applications to Single-Cell eQTL Mapping.

ArXiv·2026
Same author

Semi-targeted Metabolomics Analysis of Biomarkers of Low to Moderate Alcohol Intake in the Postmenopausal Women's Alcohol Study: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Feeding Study.

The Journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

Maternal serum concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the Finnish Maternity Cohort.

Environmental research·2026
Same author

Plasma amino acids in early pregnancy and fetal growth trajectories across pregnancy: findings from a multi-racial U.S. pregnancy cohort.

European journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

Validation of Methylated DNA Markers for Esophageal Squamous Cancer: An International Study.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

Drinking water nitrate, disinfection byproducts, and prostate cancer incidence in the Agricultural Health Study.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Estimating diagnostic accuracy of multiple binary tests with an imperfect reference standard.

Paul S Albert1

  • 1Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, U.S.A. albertp@ctep.nci.nih.gov

Statistics in Medicine
|December 23, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Estimating diagnostic accuracy with imperfect reference standards is crucial. This study presents a robust methodology using external data for accurate test performance evaluation, even without a perfect gold standard.

More Related Videos

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Diagnostic medicine
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical testing evaluation

Background:

  • Estimating diagnostic accuracy often relies on a gold standard reference, which is not always available.
  • Imperfect reference standards are commonly used, introducing potential biases in accuracy estimation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a methodology for estimating diagnostic accuracy of multiple binary tests using an imperfect reference standard.
  • To incorporate external data on the imperfect test's accuracy into the estimation process.
  • To provide a framework for analyzing diagnostic test performance when a gold standard is absent.

Main Methods:

  • Development of alternative joint models to characterize dependence between experimental tests.
  • Utilizing external data sources for the imperfect reference standard's accuracy.
  • Analytical and simulation techniques to assess the proposed methodology's robustness.

Main Results:

  • The proposed methodology enables estimation of individual test sensitivity and specificity.
  • Multivariate post-test probabilities (predictive values) can be accurately estimated.
  • Inferences on diagnostic accuracy remain robust even with joint model misspecification, provided the imperfect test has high sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusions:

  • The study offers a valuable statistical approach for diagnostic accuracy assessment in the frequent scenario of imperfect reference standards.
  • The methodology is applicable to various diagnostic tests, including HIV-antibody tests.
  • Accurate estimation of diagnostic accuracy is achievable by leveraging external data and appropriate modeling techniques.