Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

On many occasions, physicists, other scientists, and engineers need to make estimates of a particular quantity. These are sometimes referred to as guesstimates, order-of-magnitude approximations, back-of-the-envelope calculations, or Fermi calculations. The physicist Enrico Fermi was famous for his ability to estimate various kinds of data with surprising precision. Estimating does not mean guessing a number or a formula at random. Instead, estimation means using prior experience and sound...

Statistical Analysis: Overview

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...

Quantitative Analysis

Quantitative Analysis

Quantitative analysis is a technique for measuring the amount of specific constituents in a sample. When the sample's composition is unknown, qualitative analysis is performed first to identify its components, which ensures that the correct substances are measured during the quantitative phase.
In quantitative analysis, two key measurements are made: the sample quantity and a property proportional to the amount of the analyte (the substance being analyzed). This forms the basis of the method...

Uncertainty: Overview

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Effects of task structure and confirmation bias in alternative hypotheses evaluation.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2024

Same author

Representative design: A realistic alternative to (systematic) integrative design.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2024

Same author

On conducting ethically sound psychological science in the metaverse.

The American psychologist·2024

Same author

Health, Wellbeing, and Social Interaction: An International and Demographic Analysis of Perceived Life Changes and the Positives and Negatives of the COVID-19 Lockdown.

Europe's journal of psychology·2023

Same author

A Multi-disciplinary and Comparative Approach to Evaluating Pre-trial Detention Decisions: Towards Evidence-Based Reform.

European journal on criminal policy and research·2022

Same author

Communicating uncertainty using words and numbers.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

On measuring quantitative interpretations of reasonable doubt.

Mandeep K Dhami¹

¹Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. mkd25@cam.ac.uk

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied

|December 24, 2008

Summary

This study introduces the membership function (MF) method for quantifying reasonable doubt in criminal trials. Findings reveal that different interpretation methods, including MF, yield varied results, impacting legal research validity.

More Related Videos

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Area of Science:

Legal Psychology
Cognitive Science
Decision Making

Background:

Reasonable doubt is a critical standard for criminal conviction.
Quantitative interpretations of reasonable doubt lack standardized measurement.
Existing methods may not fully capture the nuances of this legal threshold.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce and evaluate the membership function (MF) method for measuring quantitative interpretations of reasonable doubt.
To compare the MF method with direct rating and decision theory-based approaches.
To explore inter-individual and intra-individual variability in understanding reasonable doubt.

Main Methods:

Development and application of the membership function (MF) method.
Comparison with direct rating and decision theory-based interpretation methods.
Experimental design involving participants' interpretation of reasonable doubt and verdict prediction.

Main Results:

The MF method, direct rating, and decision theory methods yielded significantly different and uncorrelated interpretations of reasonable doubt.
All methods equally predicted verdicts, but showed inter-individual variability.
Only the direct rating method was significantly affected by judicial instructions in Experiment 2.
The MF method exhibited intra-individual variability in both experiments.

Conclusions:

Different methods capture distinct aspects of reasonable doubt.
The MF method offers a novel quantitative approach but shows variability.
Findings challenge the validity of prior research and highlight the importance of methodological triangulation in studying reasonable doubt.