Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
Published on: May 10, 2019
Race-based shifting standards and racial discrimination
Monica Biernat1, Elizabeth C Collins, Iva Katzarska-Miller
1Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045-7556, USA. biernat@ku.edu
The shifting standards effect, where judgments differ based on group stereotypes, was studied in relation to racial prejudice. This effect predicted reduced funding for a Black student organization, especially when implicit prejudice was high.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Psychology of Prejudice
- Intergroup Relations
Background:
- Stereotyped groups are often judged using group-specific standards, leading to different interpretations of subjective descriptions.
- The "shifting standards" effect occurs when objective judgments assimilate more strongly to stereotypes than subjective ones.
- Understanding how these shifting standards influence perceptions of academic competence across racial groups is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between the shifting standards effect in judging academic competence and measures of racial prejudice.
- To determine if the shifting standards effect predicts race-relevant behavioral decisions.
- To examine the moderating role of implicit prejudice on these relationships.
Main Methods:
- Three studies were conducted to assess the shifting standards effect when evaluating the academic competence of Black and White students.
- Participants' tendency to shift standards was measured and correlated with various indicators of racial prejudice.
- Behavioral outcomes, specifically resource allocation to a Black student organization, were analyzed.
Main Results:
- The tendency to shift standards was found to be uncorrelated with explicit measures of racial prejudice.
- However, the shifting standards effect significantly predicted reduced allocation of funds to a Black student organization.
- This effect was moderated by implicit prejudice, indicating a complex interplay between cognitive biases and behavioral outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The shifting standards effect in academic competence judgments is distinct from general racial prejudice measures.
- This cognitive bias can translate into discriminatory resource allocation, particularly when implicit biases are present.
- Findings highlight the importance of examining interactions between prejudice indicators and their impact on real-world decisions.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Halo Effect
Confirmation Biases
Stereotype Content Model
Motivational Bias
