Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
[Comparing Argentinian reference with WHO standards for the anthropometric evaluation of children less than 5
Carlos Anigstein1, Viviana Kerai, Amelia Acosta
1Dirección de Salud, Municipalidad de la Ciudad de Gualeguaychú, Entre Ríos. canigstein@intramed.net
Insights
The World Health Organization (WHO) growth standards identified more children with short stature but fewer with low weight compared to Argentine references. These findings highlight differences in anthropometric evaluation for children under five.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Public Health
- Anthropometry
Background:
- New World Health Organization (WHO) growth standards derived from a multicenter study of healthy children.
- Children in the WHO study adhered to strict health criteria, including breastfeeding and non-smoking recommendations.
- Established Argentine growth references exist for anthropometric evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the existing Argentine growth references with the new WHO growth standards.
- To evaluate anthropometric measurements in a population of children under five years old in Argentina.
Main Methods:
- An observational, cross-sectional, descriptive study involving 474 children under five years old.
- Standardized anthropometric measurements (height, weight) were collected using SAP-standardized instruments and techniques.
- Data were analyzed using EPI6/ANTCONV for Argentine references and ANTHRO 2005 for WHO standards, employing t-tests and Chi-squared tests.
Main Results:
- No significant difference was found in the proportion of children below -2 Standard Deviations (DS) for height-for-age between Argentine references (8.2%) and WHO standards (12.2%).
- A significant difference was observed in weight-for-age below -2 DS, with Argentine references identifying 5.1% and WHO standards identifying 2.1% (p=0.014).
- The WHO standards identified a higher percentage of children with short stature (height-for-age < -2 DS) from 12 months onwards.
Conclusions:
- The WHO growth standards identify a greater number of children with short stature compared to Argentine references from 12 months of age.
- Conversely, the WHO standards identified fewer children with low weight-for-age compared to Argentine references.
- These discrepancies suggest important differences in the anthropometric evaluation of children under five using the two sets of standards.
Introduction:
The new WHO growth standards, were the result of a multicenter growth reference study, performed on a sample of children with rigorous criteria of health, with families that had complied with the health recommendations that are made in the field of breastfeeding and not smoking.
Objective:
To compare the argentine references with the WHO standard for the anthropometric evaluation of a population of children under 5 years.
Population:
474 children younger than 5 years old who attended the Municipal Health Centers during October 2004.
Material And Methods:
Children were weighed and measured with instruments and techniques standardized by SAP. The study design was observational, cross-sectional, descriptive. We used EPI6/ ANTCONV for Argentine reference and ANTRHRO 2005 for WHO standard T test for two samples, P (T < t) two tails, and Chi 2.
Results:
Total 474, 231 boys and 243 girls. Height/ age minor - 2 DS: Argentine reference= 39 (8.2%) and WHO= 58 (12.2%), not significant. Weight/age minor -2DS: Argentine reference= 24 (5.1%) and WHO= 10 (Chi 2 p = 0.014).
Conclusions:
WHO standards, from 12 months on, selected the largest number of children with short stature, and, regarding weight, it happened the opposite, they selected less children with low weight/age.
Related Concept Videos
Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics
One of...
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.

