Diagnostics of "non-acute" vascular prosthesis infection using 18F-FDG PET/CT: our experience with 96 prostheses

M Spacek1, O Belohlavek, J Votrubova

  • 1Second Clinical Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine and General Teaching Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. mirekspacek@seznam.cz

Abstract

Insights

Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) accurately detects vascular prosthesis infection (VPI). Focal uptake and irregular graft borders are key indicators, offering high diagnostic accuracy for this life-threatening complication.

Area of Science:

  • Nuclear medicine
  • Radiology
  • Infectious disease diagnostics

Background:

  • Vascular prosthesis infection (VPI) is a serious complication affecting 0.5-5% of patients.
  • Diagnosing low-grade VPI in non-acute patients presents a significant challenge.
  • A need exists for accurate diagnostic methods for suspected VPI.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for VPI.
  • To identify key parameters for accurate VPI diagnosis using PET/CT.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective PET/CT scans in 96 vascular grafts across 76 patients with suspected VPI.
  • Analysis of FDG uptake (focal/diffuse, intensity), pseudoaneurysm, and lesion boundary characteristics.
  • Gold standard: operative findings, histopathology, or >6 months clinical follow-up.

Main Results:

  • Focal FDG uptake and irregular graft boundaries were significant predictors of VPI.
  • Combined focal uptake and irregular borders predicted VPI with 97% probability.
  • Even with non-diagnostic uptake, irregular boundaries improved VPI probability (77% vs. 28% for smooth).

Conclusions:

  • PET/CT demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (>95%) in 75% of cases.
  • PET/CT identified prostheses with diminished accuracy (70-75%) in 25% of cases.
  • PET/CT is an excellent modality for diagnosing suspected VPI.