Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Introduction to the Ultrasound Targeted Microbubble Destruction Technique

Introduction to the Ultrasound Targeted Microbubble Destruction Technique

Published on: June 12, 2011

Microbubble destruction during intravenous administration: a preliminary study.

Thomas Barrack¹, Eleanor Stride

¹Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.

Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

|December 27, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Effects of Ultrasound-Mediated Treatments on Dental Biofilm Attachment and Viability.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

Same author

Perfluorocarbon nanodroplets are cytocompatible with osteoblast-lineage cells and modulate in vitro osteoclastogenesis differentially in normoxia and hypoxia.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Comparison of ultrasound contrast agent production by sonication and mechanical agitation.

Ultrasonics sonochemistry·2026

Same author

Microbubbles manufactured using a tissue homogeniser: DoE-guided optimisation for a narrower size distribution and higher yield.

International journal of pharmaceutics·2026

Same author

Paclitaxel and rose bengal loaded microbubbles for the ultrasound targeted chemo-sonodynamic therapy of pancreatic cancer.

European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V·2025

Same author

Size matters: Micro- versus nanobubbles in ultrasound imaging and therapy.

Science advances·2025

Same journal

Multidimensional Safety Assessment of a Low-Intensity Scanning Ultrasound (SUS) Protocol in Sheep.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

Same journal

Acoustic Characterization of a Modified IEC Agar-Based Tissue-Mimicking Material Across the 3.5-50 MHz Frequency Range.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

Same journal

Deep Learning-Based Standard Section Recognition and Multi-Organ Segmentation in Upper Abdominal Ultrasound.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

Same journal

Cardiac Natural Mechanical Wave Detection and Speed Estimation Using Deep Learning-Based 2-D Ultrasound Imaging: A Feasibility Study.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

Same journal

Region-Specific Evaluation of Plaque Segmentation in Cross-sectional Projections of Carotid Ultrasound Images Using Deep Learning Models in a Sub-clinical Atherosclerosis Cohort.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

Same journal

Simulating the Dedifferentiation Process of Thyroid Cancer: Insights from Mouse Models and Ultrasound Imaging.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

See all related articles

Microbubble administration significantly impacts concentration, with smaller needles causing drastic reductions. Increasing flow rate and using glycerol can minimize microbubble destruction, crucial for diagnostic and therapeutic uses.

Area of Science:

Biomedical Engineering
Materials Science
Fluid Dynamics

Background:

Microbubble suspensions are vital for diagnostic and therapeutic medical applications.
Accurate control over microbubble concentration and size distribution is essential for efficacy.
Understanding administration variables is key to preserving microbubble integrity.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how administration variables affect microbubble population.
To identify factors influencing microbubble destruction during administration.
To inform optimal administration protocols for microbubble agents.

Main Methods:

Examined the impact of syringe and needle inner diameter on microbubble concentration.
Assessed the effect of volume flow rate on microbubble destruction.

More Related Videos

Real-Time Intravital Multiphoton Microscopy to Visualize Focused Ultrasound and Microbubble Treatments to Increase Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability

Real-Time Intravital Multiphoton Microscopy to Visualize Focused Ultrasound and Microbubble Treatments to Increase Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability

Published on: February 5, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Introduction to the Ultrasound Targeted Microbubble Destruction Technique

Introduction to the Ultrasound Targeted Microbubble Destruction Technique

Published on: June 12, 2011

Real-Time Intravital Multiphoton Microscopy to Visualize Focused Ultrasound and Microbubble Treatments to Increase Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability

Real-Time Intravital Multiphoton Microscopy to Visualize Focused Ultrasound and Microbubble Treatments to Increase Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability

Published on: February 5, 2022

Investigated the role of suspending fluid (distilled water vs. glycerol) on microbubble stability.

Analyzed microbubble response to hydrostatic pressure and shear stress.

Main Results:

Reducing syringe or needle inner diameter drastically decreased microbubble concentration (up to 99.9% for needles <0.24 mm).
Increased volume flow rate (up to 3 mL/min) and using glycerol reduced microbubble destruction.
Shear stress, not hydrostatic pressure, appears to be the primary cause of microbubble destruction.

Conclusions:

Current microbubble administration procedures require review, especially for therapeutic applications.
Microbubble size, concentration, and composition are critical factors in administration.
Results are relevant for assessing accuracy in automated microbubble sizing equipment.