Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
Nursing Clinical Information System01:27

Nursing Clinical Information System

Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS)
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
Methods of Documentation II: POMR01:26

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...
Nursing Implementation01:15

Nursing Implementation

Implementation is the execution of the nursing care plan developed during the planning phase.
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Delivering effective non-invasive ventilation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using intensive remote support (DENIM): protocol for an embedded process evaluation in a hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness trial.

Implementation science communications·2026
Same author

Diagnostic models for male lower urinary tract symptom management in primary care.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
Same author

The incidence of avoidable healthcare-associated harm in prisons in England: a retrospective case note review.

BMJ quality & safety·2026
Same author

Exploration of between-hospital variation and the basis for decision making in management of malignant colorectal polyps- a Danish population-based study.

World journal of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Barriers and facilitators to knowledge translation at the science-policy interface during the COVID-19 pandemic public health emergency: a rapid review and theoretical analysis to inform development of a logic model.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Interventions that support women, girls, and people who menstruate to participate in physical activity: a rapid overview of reviews.

BMC public health·2026

Related Experiment Videos

Arduous implementation: does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support

Glyn Elwyn1, France Légaré, Trudy van der Weijden

  • 1Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, CF14 4YS, UK. elwyng@cardiff.ac.uk

Implementation Science : IS
|January 2, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Decision support technologies (DSTs) improve patient care but face implementation challenges. Applying the Normalization Process Model reveals that focusing solely on interactional workability overlooks crucial organizational and social factors for routine embedding.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Implementation Science
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Decision support technologies (DSTs) are designed to aid collaborative decision-making between patients and healthcare professionals.
  • While trials demonstrate positive effects on patient knowledge and satisfaction, DSTs are not routinely integrated into healthcare.
  • Previous implementation studies have rarely utilized theoretical frameworks to understand adoption barriers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the implementation challenges of DSTs in routine healthcare settings.
  • To utilize the Normalization Process Model (NPM) as a theoretical framework for understanding DST implementation.
  • To identify factors that promote or inhibit the routine embedding of DSTs.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis based on the Normalization Process Model (NPM).
  • Examination of previous primary research and reviews on DST implementation.
  • Application of NPM concepts to assess DST workability, knowledge dynamics, user skills, and resource allocation within virtual environments.

Main Results:

  • The NPM framework provided insights into DST implementation barriers.
  • Current research predominantly focuses on the interactional aspects of DSTs.
  • Factors concerning labor division, healthcare structures, and organizational context are under-examined.

Conclusions:

  • The NPM effectively identifies facilitators and inhibitors for DST implementation in healthcare.
  • The model highlights the impact of power and knowledge asymmetries on technology adoption.
  • Future DST development requires a holistic approach, considering structural conditions and social norms for successful deployment.