A single-blinded, randomized comparison of laparoscopic versus open hernia repair in children

Antti I Koivusalo1, Reijo Korpela, Kari Wirtavuori

  • 1Section of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. antti.koivusalo@hus.fi

Pediatrics
|January 2, 2009
PubMed

Insights

Pediatric inguinal hernia repair outcomes are similar for laparoscopic surgery and open repair. However, laparoscopic repair involves longer operating times and increased postoperative pain in children.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Hernia Repair

Background:

  • The efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for pediatric inguinal hernia repair remains debated.
  • Open repair is the traditional method, but minimally invasive techniques are increasingly explored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare day-case laparoscopic hernia repair with open repair in children.
  • To evaluate recovery time, postoperative pain, operative time, and complications.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, single-blinded randomized study included 89 children (4 months to 16 years) with unilateral inguinal hernia.
  • Primary outcome: time to normal daily activities. Secondary outcomes: pain, operative time, results, complications.

Main Results:

  • Mean time to normal activity was similar (2.4 days laparoscopic vs. 2.5 days open).
  • Laparoscopic repair had significantly higher rates of rescue analgesia (79% vs. 42%) and higher pain scores.
  • Operative time was longer for laparoscopic repair (63 min vs. 38 min).

Conclusions:

  • Open and laparoscopic hernia repair yield similar recovery and outcomes in children.
  • Laparoscopic repair in children is associated with increased operative time and postoperative pain.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos