Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Childhood obesity and medical neglect
Todd Varness1, David B Allen, Aaron L Carrel
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health,, Madison, WI 53792-4108, USA. tvarness@uwhealth.org
Insights
Childhood obesity, especially severe cases with comorbidities, raises questions about medical neglect. Removal from home is only justified in extreme situations where harm is imminent and all other options fail.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Public Health
- Medical Ethics
Background:
- Childhood obesity rates are rising dramatically, leading to severe cases and related health issues.
- This trend necessitates evaluating whether extreme obesity constitutes medical neglect.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish criteria for determining when severe childhood obesity may warrant state intervention.
- To explore the ethical considerations of removing children from their homes due to obesity-related health risks.
Main Methods:
- This opinion piece outlines a framework for assessing medical neglect in severe childhood obesity cases.
- It proposes three critical conditions that must be met for justified intervention.
Main Results:
- Serious imminent harm, likelihood of effective treatment via intervention, and absence of alternatives are key criteria.
- Comorbid conditions, not just obesity degree, are critical for determining harm.
Conclusions:
- State intervention, including removal from home, is a last resort for a small subset of obese children with severe comorbidities.
- Enforced treatment outside the home may be indicated to prevent irreversible harm in these specific, limited cases.
Abstract:
The incidence of childhood obesity has increased dramatically, including severe childhood obesity and obesity-related comorbid conditions. Cases of severe childhood obesity have prompted the following question: does childhood obesity ever constitute medical neglect? In our opinion, removal of a child from the home is justified when all 3 of the following conditions are present: (1) a high likelihood that serious imminent harm will occur; (2) a reasonable likelihood that coercive state intervention will result in effective treatment; and (3) the absence of alternative options for addressing the problem. It is not the mere presence or degree of obesity but rather the presence of comorbid conditions that is critical for the determination of serious imminent harm. All 3 criteria are met in very limited cases, that is, the subset of obese children who have serious comorbid conditions and for whom all alternative options have been exhausted. In these limited cases, a trial of enforced treatment outside the home may be indicated, to protect the child from irreversible harm.
Related Concept Videos
Obesity
Bulimia Nervosa
Nature and Nurture
Anorexia Nervosa
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...
Inborn Errors of Metabolism
Overview of Protein Metabolism
Amino acids play various roles in the body once they are absorbed into cells. They are restructured...

