Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
Published on: February 19, 2018
To generalize or not to generalize: spatial categories are influenced by physical attributes and language
Susan J Hespos1, Thomas B Piccin
1Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. hespos@northwestern.edu
Abstract:
The current work explored the conditions under which infants generalize spatial relationships from one event to another. English-learning 5-month-olds habituated to a tight- or loose-fit covering event dishabituated to a change in fit during a containment test event, but infants habituated to a visually similar occlusion event did not. Thus, infants' responses appeared to be driven by the physical nature of the fit rather than visual similarity. This response pattern was replicated with Korean-speaking adults, but English-speaking adults showed no sensitivity to change in fit for either event. These findings suggest that language development links linguistic forms to universal, pre-existing representations of meaning, and that linguistic experience can shape sensitivity to distinctions that are marked in one's native language.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Language and Cognition
Selected Data About Geographic Locations
How Data are Classified: Categorical Data
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
Lateralization
Trait Centrality
Implicit Personality Theories

