Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

06:04
Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
Published on: January 17, 2025
An in-group advantage in detecting intergroup anxiety
Heather M Gray1, Wendy Berry Mendes, Carrigan Denny-Brown
1Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. hgray@challiance.org
Psychological Science
|January 6, 2009
Summary
Same-race observers better detected anxiety in interracial interactions than different-race observers. This in-group advantage suggests challenges in shared emotional experiences between racial groups.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Intergroup Relations
- Nonverbal Behavior Analysis
Background:
- Understanding intergroup anxiety is crucial for improving intergroup relations.
- Previous research suggests potential biases in perceiving emotions across racial lines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether an in-group advantage exists in detecting anxiety during same-race versus interracial interactions.
- To explore if observers' racial group influences their perception of participants' anxiety.
Main Methods:
- White and Black participants engaged in same-race and interracial interactions, recorded via video.
- White and Black observers, unaware of the racial context, rated participants' anxiety levels from the videos.
- Participant anxiety was also measured through cortisol level changes.
Main Results:
- Same-race observers accurately perceived anxiety modulation based on racial context, unlike different-race observers.
- This in-group advantage was observed for both global anxiety and specific anxiety-related behaviors.
- Only same-race observers' anxiety descriptions correlated with participants' physiological cortisol changes.
Conclusions:
- A significant in-group advantage exists in perceiving intergroup anxiety.
- This suggests that racial group membership influences the accurate detection of anxiety in others.
- Findings indicate potential difficulties for White and Black Americans in establishing a shared emotional understanding across racial divides.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
In- and Out-Groups
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
Impact of Groups on Groups
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
Robbers Cave
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
Surveys
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
Social Loafing
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...

