Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026
09:45
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
Published on: January 23, 2017
Reorienting when cues conflict: evidence for an adaptive-combination view
Kristin R Ratliff1, Nora S Newcombe
1University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. krratliff@uchicago.edu
Psychological Science
|January 6, 2009
Summary
Human adults show similar spatial reorientation strategies to children and animals, with environmental size and experience influencing reliance on geometric cues versus environmental features.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Comparative Cognition
- Spatial Navigation
Background:
- The geometric module hypothesis posits distinct spatial reorientation mechanisms in human adults compared to children and animals.
- Previous research often focused on isolated environments, potentially overlooking the impact of environmental context and experience.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate similarities in spatial reorientation between human adults, children, and nonhuman animals.
- To examine the influence of environmental size and learning history on the use of geometric versus feature-based spatial information.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments employed a conflict paradigm to assess spatial reorientation strategies.
- Participants (human adults) were tested in environments of varying sizes (small and large rooms) with differing learning histories.
Main Results:
- Adults favored geometric cues in small rooms and features in larger rooms.
- Experience in a larger room led adults to prioritize features over geometric cues in a small room, contradicting geometric information.
Conclusions:
- Findings challenge the modularity hypothesis and the view of feature use as purely associative.
- Spatial reorientation relies on an adaptive-combination system that weights geometric and feature cues based on environmental context and experience.
Related Concept Videos
01:25The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
01:42Schemas
A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
01:38Cognitive Dissonance
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
01:20Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable options,...
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable options,...
01:31Confirmation Biases
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
01:53Cause and Effect
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?