Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical approaches for modeling radiologists' interpretive performance.

Diana L Miglioretti1, Sebastien J P A Haneuse, Melissa L Anderson

  • 1Group Health Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. miglioretti.d@ghc.org

Academic Radiology
|January 7, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Summary of "psychotherapy research in the deaf community: lessons learned".

Journal of deaf studies and deaf education·2026
Same author

<i>Is Anybody Out There?</i> Understanding the Reach of Lung Cancer Screening Health Communication Through EHR Patient Portal.

Journal of health communication·2026
Same author

Performance of Statistical and Machine Learning Risk Prediction Models for Advanced Breast Cancers.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026
Same author

Preventing Severe Hypoglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial of Proactive Care With Versus Without Psychoeducation.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same author

Using Artificial Intelligence to Improve Timeliness of Follow-Up in Breast Cancer Screening.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same author

Trends in Pediatric Imaging From 1997 to 2024 in an Integrated Health Care Setting.

Hospital pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating the Impact of Embolization on Outcomes in Iliopsoas Hematomas: A Multicenter Retrospective Propensity-matched Study.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction Presets In Ultra-high-resolution Photon-counting CT Angiography of Patients with Total Knee Endoprosthesis.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Deep Learning for Opportunistic Vertebral Fracture Detection on Routine Thoraco-abdominal Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic Meta-analysis of Patient-level Diagnostic Test Accuracy.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

"Where are They Now?": A Single Institution's 10-Years Experience with an Integrated Nuclear Radiology Fellowship.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Dual-layer Spectral Detector CT Quantitative Parameters for Predicting Tumor Budding Grade and Prognosis in Stage Ⅱ Colorectal Cancer.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Promotion from Associate Professor to Full Professor Should Not Be Monolithic: A National Bibliometric Study by Radiology Subspecialty.

Academic radiology·2026
See all related articles

Understanding the impact of interpretive volume on mammography accuracy requires careful statistical analysis. This review highlights how different statistical models for clustered data can influence research findings on radiologist performance.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Imaging Analysis

Background:

  • Consensus on optimal mammography interpretation volume standards for radiologists remains elusive.
  • Discrepancies in statistical methodologies contribute to varied findings in studies on interpretive volume and accuracy.
  • Radiologist performance studies often involve clustered data, necessitating appropriate statistical handling of dependent interpretations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To raise awareness regarding the differences between statistical approaches for analyzing clustered data in radiologist performance research.
  • To clarify how varying statistical frameworks impact the interpretation of results concerning mammography accuracy.
  • To guide researchers in selecting appropriate statistical models for clustered binary outcomes.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of statistical frameworks for modeling binary measures of interpretive performance.
  • Focus on marginal and conditional regression models for clustered data.
  • Discussion of statistical issues influencing estimation and inference in clustered data analysis.

Main Results:

  • Both marginal and conditional models account for dependence in clustered data, but parameter interpretations differ.
  • The choice of statistical framework can implicitly shape the scientific question being addressed.
  • Statistical issues can significantly impact the estimation, inference, and scientific interpretation of findings.

Conclusions:

  • Awareness of statistical approach differences is crucial for consistent mammography accuracy research.
  • Appropriate statistical modeling is essential for accurately understanding variability in radiologist performance.
  • Findings are relevant to the National Cancer Institute's Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium and broader research on clustered binary outcomes.