Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are adult stem cells that can differentiate into most connective tissue cell types, except for hematopoietic cells, depending upon the source of MSCs. For example, bone-marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs) can differentiate into osteocytes, hepatocytes, and pancreatic and neuronal cells. MSCs can be isolated from various sources such as bone marrow, placenta, adipose tissue, teeth, and Wharton’s jelly, a gelatinous substance in the umbilical cord. The ease of their access...

Somatic to iPS Cell Reprogramming

Somatic to iPS Cell Reprogramming

Reprogramming alters the gene expression in somatic cells, transforming them into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells over several generations. Scientists can reprogram cells by introducing genes for four transcription factors—Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (OSKM) by viral or non-viral methods. These factors are also known as Yamanaka factors after Shinya Yamanaka, who first generated iPS cells using mouse skin cells. Yamanaka was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2012 for this...

Master Transcription Regulators

Master Transcription Regulators

Master transcription regulators are regulatory proteins that are predominantly responsible for regulating the expression of multiple genes. Often these genes work in concert to drive a complex process. Activation of a master transcription regulator can lead to a cascade of transcriptional activation necessary for that outcome. These regulators can directly bind to the regulatory sequences of the various genes involved, or they can indirectly regulate transcription by binding to regulatory...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Strategy for Simultaneous Multiomic Survey of N-Glycomic and Extracellular Matrix Proteome by Mass Spectrometry Imaging.

Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry·2026

Same author

Correction: ISSLS Prize in Clinical Science 2026: Data-driven classification of lumbar spine degeneration trajectories in chronic low back pain.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2026

Same author

Celebrating ISSLS Science, Leadership, Legacy, and Partnership with the European Spine Journal.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2026

Same author

Vertebral endplate bone marrow lesion composition: relation to Modic change classification and associations with chronic low back pain.

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society·2026

Same author

A meta-model of low back pain to examine collective expert knowledge of treatment effects and their mechanisms.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2026

Same author

Optimized Approach for Retrieval of Multiple Impacted Teeth in Cleidocranial Dysplasia.

The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Comparison of Two Representative Methods for Differentiation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells into Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

Comparison of Two Representative Methods for Differentiation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells into Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

Published on: October 20, 2023

Pressure and distortion regulate human mesenchymal stem cell gene expression.

Anne K Haudenschild¹, Adam H Hsieh, Sunil Kapila

¹UCSF/UCB Joint Graduate Group in Bioengineering, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

|January 7, 2009

Summary

Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) can differentiate based on mechanical forces. Dynamic tension promotes fibroblastic and osteogenic genes, while compression stimulates chondrogenesis, offering insights for tissue regeneration.

More Related Videos

Oct4GiP Reporter Assay to Study Genes that Regulate Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Maintenance and Self-renewal

Oct4GiP Reporter Assay to Study Genes that Regulate Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Maintenance and Self-renewal

Published on: May 30, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Comparison of Two Representative Methods for Differentiation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells into Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

Comparison of Two Representative Methods for Differentiation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells into Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

Published on: October 20, 2023

Oct4GiP Reporter Assay to Study Genes that Regulate Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Maintenance and Self-renewal

Oct4GiP Reporter Assay to Study Genes that Regulate Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Maintenance and Self-renewal

Published on: May 30, 2012

Area of Science:

Biomedical Engineering
Stem Cell Biology
Mechanobiology

Background:

Physical forces like tension and compression are crucial for mature tissue development.
The specific role of mechanical loading in differentiating uncommitted cells, such as human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs), remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how dynamic tensile and compressive loading influence the differentiation and gene expression of hMSCs.
To understand the mechanotransduction pathways involved in hMSC responses to mechanical stimuli.

Main Methods:

hMSCs were subjected to dynamic tensile and compressive mechanical loading.
Gene expression patterns were analyzed to identify distinct cellular responses.
Changes in cell shape and volume were correlated with gene expression data.

Main Results:

hMSCs demonstrated the ability to differentiate gene expression in response to distinct mechanical cues.
Dynamic tension upregulated genes associated with fibroblastic and osteogenic differentiation.
Dynamic compression specifically upregulated genes linked to chondrogenesis.

Conclusions:

hMSCs can distinguish between tensile and compressive mechanical forces, leading to specific differentiation pathways.
Understanding these mechanotransduction mechanisms is key for designing effective tissue regeneration strategies.
This research provides a foundation for rationally engineering tissues by controlling mechanical environments.