Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy01:18

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy

Optical microscopy uses optic principles to provide detailed images of samples. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek designed the first compound optical microscope in the 17th century to visualize blood cells, bacteria, and yeast cells. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes with enhanced magnification and resolution.
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving Customer Service with Accommodations and Recognition.

Radiology management·2019
Same journal

Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

Image manipulation as research misconduct.

Debra Parrish1, Bridget Noonan

  • 1Parrish Law Offices, 615 Washington Road Suite 200, Pittsburgh, PA 15228, USA. debbie@dparrishlaw.com

Science and Engineering Ethics
|January 7, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Research misconduct involving image manipulation is increasing. This study examines cases, detection methods, sanctions, and the underutilization of new detection tools by institutions.

More Related Videos

Experimental Assessment of Mouse Sociability Using an Automated Image Processing Approach
08:24

Experimental Assessment of Mouse Sociability Using an Automated Image Processing Approach

Published on: May 15, 2016

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
06:53

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

Experimental Assessment of Mouse Sociability Using an Automated Image Processing Approach
08:24

Experimental Assessment of Mouse Sociability Using an Automated Image Processing Approach

Published on: May 15, 2016

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
06:53

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Scientific integrity
  • Research ethics
  • Biomedical research

Background:

  • Increasing prevalence of research misconduct cases involving image manipulation.
  • Image manipulation techniques range from enhancement to misrepresentation and alteration.
  • The Office of Research Integrity (ORI) handles a significant number of these cases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze misconduct findings related to image manipulation.
  • To discuss methods for detecting manipulated images.
  • To explore sanctions and reasons for non-findings in flawed image cases.

Main Methods:

  • Case study analysis of research misconduct involving image manipulation.
  • Review of detection methods and their effectiveness.
  • Examination of sanctions and legal/ethical considerations.

Main Results:

  • Identified common image manipulation techniques and their detection.
  • Discussed factors influencing misconduct findings and sanctions.
  • Highlighted the underadoption of available image detection tools by institutions and journals.

Conclusions:

  • Need for robust policies and consistent application of detection tools to uphold research integrity.
  • Importance of addressing the gap between available technology and its implementation in preventing scientific misconduct.
  • Call for greater awareness and proactive measures against image manipulation in scientific publications.