An outcome-based approach for the creation of fetal growth standards: do singletons and twins need separate
K S Joseph1, John Fahey, Robert W Platt
1Perinatal Epidemiology Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. ksjoseph@dal.ca
Insights
Separate fetal growth standards are needed for twins and singletons. Optimal birth weight ranges, minimizing neonatal risks, differ significantly between twin and singleton infants, supporting plurality-specific standards.
Area of Science:
- Perinatology
- Neonatal Health
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Current fetal growth standards rely on theoretical percentile distributions.
- The need for distinct growth standards for singleton and twin pregnancies remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if separate fetal growth standards are required for singletons versus twins.
- To identify optimal birth weight ranges associated with minimal neonatal morbidity and mortality.
Main Methods:
- Utilized an outcome-based methodology on a large dataset of US livebirths (1995-2002).
- Analyzed singleton and twin livebirths between 36 and 42 weeks' gestation (n=17,811,922).
- Identified birth weight ranges with the lowest rates of serious neonatal morbidity and mortality.
Main Results:
- Optimal birth weight ranges for minimizing neonatal risks were identified for both singletons and twins.
- The lower limit of the optimal birth weight range was significantly lower for twins compared to singletons (152g difference).
- Minor variations in optimal birth weight were noted based on maternal factors, but plurality was a key differentiator.
Conclusions:
- Birth weight-specific morbidity and mortality patterns support the necessity of plurality-specific fetal growth standards.
- Current theoretical standards may not adequately represent the optimal growth trajectory for twin infants.
- Clinical guidelines should consider distinct fetal growth references for singleton and twin pregnancies.
Abstract:
Contemporary fetal growth standards are created by using theoretical properties (percentiles) of birth weight (for gestational age) distributions. The authors used a clinically relevant, outcome-based methodology to determine if separate fetal growth standards are required for singletons and twins. All singleton and twin livebirths between 36 and 42 weeks' gestation in the United States (1995-2002) were included, after exclusions for missing information and other factors (n = 17,811,922). A birth weight range was identified, at each gestational age, over which serious neonatal morbidity and neonatal mortality rates were lowest. Among singleton males at 40 weeks, serious neonatal morbidity/mortality rates were lowest between 3,012 g (95% confidence interval (CI): 3,008, 3,018) and 3,978 g (95% CI: 3,976, 3,980). The low end of this optimal birth weight range for females was 37 g (95% CI: 21, 53) less. The low optimal birth weight was 152 g (95% CI: 121, 183) less for twins compared with singletons. No differences were observed in low optimal birth weight by period (1999-2002 vs. 1995-1998), but small differences were observed for maternal education, race, parity, age, and smoking status. Patterns of birth weight-specific serious neonatal morbidity/neonatal mortality support the need for plurality-specific fetal growth standards.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Regression Toward the Mean
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
Ovarian Cycle
Nature and Nurture
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...


