Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

One-Degree-of-Freedom System01:24

One-Degree-of-Freedom System

In mechanical engineering, one-degree-of-freedom systems form the basis of a wide range of electrical and mechanical components. Using these models, engineers can predict the behavior of various parts in a larger system, which gives them insight into how different forces interact with each other.
A one-degree-of-freedom system is defined by an independent variable that determines its state and behavior. One example of a one-degree-of-freedom system is a simple harmonic oscillator, such as a...
Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
Controller Configurations01:22

Controller Configurations

Controller configurations are crucial in a car's cruise control system because they manage speed over time to maintain a consistent pace regardless of road conditions, thereby meeting design goals. In traditional control systems, fixed-configuration design involves predetermined controller placement. System performance modifications are known as compensation.
Control-system compensation involves various configurations, most commonly series or cascade compensation, in which the controller aligns...
Open and closed-loop control systems01:17

Open and closed-loop control systems

Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal and...
PD Controller: Design01:26

PD Controller: Design

In automotive engineering, car suspension systems often employ Proportional Derivative (PD) controllers to enhance performance. PD controllers are utilized to adjust the damping force in response to road conditions. A controller, acting as an amplifier with a constant gain, demonstrates proportional control, with output directly mirroring input.
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cognitive Impairment Is Associated with Disrupted Motor Planning in Older Adults.

Neuro-degenerative diseases·2026
Same author

How individual vigor shapes human-human physical interaction.

eLife·2026
Same author

Comparing arm to whole-body motor control disambiguates age-related deterioration from compensation.

Frontiers in aging·2026
Same author

Model predictive game control for personalized and targeted interactive assistance.

Communications engineering·2026
Same author

Influence of myelo-architectures on direct cortical response evoked by electrical stimulation.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2025
Same author

How task-relevant vibratory feedback from an active exoskeleton can lead to ergonomic postures.

Communications engineering·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
06:58

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study

Published on: November 6, 2015

Modular control of pointing beyond arm's length.

Bastien Berret1, François Bonnetblanc, Charalambos Papaxanthis

  • 1Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, Campus Universitaire, Unité de Formation et de Recherche en Sciences et Techniques des Activités Physiques et Sportives, F-21078 Dijon, France.

The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience
|January 9, 2009
PubMed
Summary

The brain flexibly coordinates reaching and balance. It uses separate modules for arm and body movements, adapting to task demands for integrated or distinct control.

More Related Videos

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
06:58

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study

Published on: November 6, 2015

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Biomechanics

Background:

  • Human motor behavior involves complex coordination of hand reaching and bipedal equilibrium.
  • Understanding how the brain integrates postural control and reaching is crucial for explaining goal-oriented actions.
  • The debate exists whether these functions are managed by a single integrated module or separate control systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the organizational principles of motor commands for combined reaching and postural control.
  • To determine if the central nervous system (CNS) uses a unified or modular approach to coordinate these actions.
  • To explore the flexibility of motor control in adapting to different task constraints.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized principal component and correlation analyses to examine joint angle covariation during whole-body pointing tasks.
  • Employed constrained reaching experiments manipulating base of support and endpoint trajectories (straight, semicircular).
  • Performed numerical simulations to model the integration and separation of motor subtasks.

Main Results:

  • Identified a low-dimensional organization enabling simultaneous reaching and center of mass (CoM) regulation.
  • Demonstrated that joint coordination dissociates into task-dependent and task-independent modules (arm vs. body) under imposed finger path conditions.
  • Observed that motor commands can be combined or separated into functional synergies based on task requirements.

Conclusions:

  • The CNS employs a modular and flexible organization for coordinating reaching and postural control.
  • Arm and body movements are controlled by distinct, yet adaptable, functional synergies.
  • Motor control is dynamically organized to integrate or separate subtasks according to specific task demands.