Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Microarrays02:34

DNA Microarrays

Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing an expanded version of My Diabetes Care in English and Spanish: A design and formative usability study.

Digital health·2026
Same author

Long-term outcomes of hyperadrenergic orthostatic hypotension.

Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society·2026
Same author

Pilot study of a patient portal intervention designed to empower patients to address diabetes care gaps.

Digital health·2026
Same author

Dexmedetomidine Prolongs the Duration of Ropivacaine Corneal Anesthesia After Subconjunctival Injection in Healthy Horses.

Veterinary ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Leveraging a Bayesian Approach in a Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events.

Clinical epidemiology·2025
Same author

Validation of data in the Veteran health administration electronic medical record for identification of tobacco use.

Annals of epidemiology·2025
Same journal

SNPio: a Python interface for population genomic data processing.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SpaHNR: a spatial domain identification method via sparse attention-based hierarchical node representation and multi-view contrastive learning.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

NAP: an open source pipeline for cross-domain microbiome profiling using Nanopore sequencing-derived amplicon data.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SurvGME: an R package for survival analysis with graphical and measurement error models.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SimMapNet: a Bayesian framework for gene regulatory network inference using gene ontology similarities as external hint.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Lung microRNA Profiling Across the Estrous Cycle in Ozone-exposed Mice
07:07

Lung microRNA Profiling Across the Estrous Cycle in Ozone-exposed Mice

Published on: January 7, 2019

Filtering for increased power for microarray data analysis.

Amber J Hackstadt1, Ann M Hess

  • 1Center for Bioinformatics and Department of Statistics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA. hackstad@stat.colostate.edu

BMC Bioinformatics
|January 10, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Filtering microarray data before analysis increases the power to detect differentially expressed genes. Variance and detection call filtering methods improve gene identification while controlling the false discovery rate.

More Related Videos

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries
11:59

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries

Published on: August 11, 2011

Global Gene Expression Analysis Using a Zebrafish Oligonucleotide Microarray Platform
13:14

Global Gene Expression Analysis Using a Zebrafish Oligonucleotide Microarray Platform

Published on: August 10, 2009

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Lung microRNA Profiling Across the Estrous Cycle in Ozone-exposed Mice
07:07

Lung microRNA Profiling Across the Estrous Cycle in Ozone-exposed Mice

Published on: January 7, 2019

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries
11:59

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries

Published on: August 11, 2011

Global Gene Expression Analysis Using a Zebrafish Oligonucleotide Microarray Platform
13:14

Global Gene Expression Analysis Using a Zebrafish Oligonucleotide Microarray Platform

Published on: August 10, 2009

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • Multiple hypothesis testing in microarray analysis necessitates adjustments.
  • High test numbers and low differential expression proportions reduce detection power.
  • Filtering reduces tests, enhancing power for identifying differentially expressed genes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate filtering methods combined with false discovery rate control.
  • To assess the impact of filtering on the power of differential gene expression analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Compared variance, average signal, and MAS detection call filtering.
  • Utilized Benjamini-Hochberg for false discovery rate control.
  • Employed q-value for false discovery rate estimation.
  • Conducted case studies and simulation studies.

Main Results:

  • Detection call and variance filtering increased identified differentially expressed genes.
  • Variance filtering on the log2 scale negatively impacted results with specific preprocessing methods.
  • Simulation confirmed variance filtering enhances power and controls false discovery rate.

Conclusions:

  • Detection call and variance filtering are effective for identifying differentially expressed genes.
  • Variance filtering boosts power while maintaining false discovery rate control.
  • Filtering approximately 50% of probe sets is reasonable when differential expression is low.