Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026
04:57
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study
Santiago G Moreno1, Alex J Sutton, A E Ades
1Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. sgm8@le.ac.uk
BMC Medical Research Methodology
|January 14, 2009
Summary
Regression-based adjustments effectively address funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analysis, outperforming traditional methods like Trim & Fill. These techniques offer a reliable way to adjust pooled estimates, improving decision-making by accounting for publication bias and small-study effects.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Medical Research Methodology
Background:
- Funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analysis often indicates publication bias or small-study effects, potentially leading to inaccurate conclusions.
- Reliable adjustment methods are crucial for meta-analysis to inform decision-making accurately.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of various methods for adjusting pooled estimates in meta-analysis for funnel plot asymmetry.
- To compare novel regression-based methods with the established Trim & Fill algorithm.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive simulation study was conducted analyzing meta-analyses with binary outcomes on the log odds ratio scale.
- Scenarios included the presence or absence of publication bias (dependent on effect size or p-value) and heterogeneity.
- Performance of adjustment methods was assessed under different conditions, including unconditional use versus conditional use based on asymmetry tests.
Main Results:
- Method performance generally decreased with increased heterogeneity and fewer studies.
- Unconditional application of adjustment methods often yielded better results than conditional application.
- Several regression-based methods consistently outperformed the Trim & Fill algorithm.
Conclusions:
- Regression-based adjustments are practical and superior to established methods for publication bias and small-study effects across various simulation scenarios.
- These methods provide a more reliable approach to adjusting meta-analysis estimates, enhancing the validity of research findings.
Related Concept Videos
01:52Regression Toward the Mean
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
01:22Bias
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
01:29Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
01:15Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
01:20Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...