Factors influencing the benefit of adjunctive devices during percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: meta-analysis and meta-regression
Amit P Amin1, Manju R Mamtani, Hemant Kulkarni
1Lata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, India.
Insights
Routine use of adjunctive devices in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is not recommended. Thrombectomy devices show benefit, and factors like gender and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors may influence outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- The efficacy of adjunctive devices during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains debated.
- Patient characteristics influencing the benefits of these devices are not well-defined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the therapeutic benefits of adjunctive devices in STEMI treatment.
- To identify patient-specific factors that modulate treatment outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Conducted meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing adjunctive devices with standard PCI.
- Assessed reperfusion outcomes including myocardial blush grade (MBG), ST-segment resolution (STR), and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow.
- Performed meta-regressions to analyze trial characteristics and their impact on heterogeneity and clinical endpoints like MACE.
Main Results:
- Meta-analyses included 23 RCTs with 5,728 patients, showing 32-35% benefit for reperfusion outcomes.
- Thrombectomy devices demonstrated greater efficacy than distal protection devices.
- Gender, glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor use, and baseline TIMI flow grade significantly predicted improved reperfusion.
Conclusions:
- Routine use of adjunctive devices in STEMI is not supported by current evidence.
- Thrombus burden, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment, and gender are potential modifiers of reperfusion benefit.
Background:
Routine use of adjunctive devices to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of patients of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is questionable. Also, the clinical characteristics of STEMI patients that can modulate the treatment benefits of adjunctive devices are not fully understood.
Objective:
To synthesize the existing literature to summarize the therapeutic benefit of the adjunctive devices and to identify the patient characteristics which relate to this therapeutic benefit.
Methods:
We conducted (i) meta-analyses of the randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the performance of the adjunctive devices with PCI for three reperfusion-related outcomes: myocardial blush grade (MBG) < 3, failed ST-segment resolution (STR), and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade < 3; (ii) stepwise meta-regressions of the effect of trial characteristics on between-trial heterogeneity; and (iii) analyses to examine whether the reperfusion-related end-points explained the between-trial difference in cardiac death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Results:
Our meta-analyses represent data from 23 RCT and 5,728 subjects. The overall therapeutic benefit attributable ranged from 32 to 35% for the reperfusion-related outcomes, and thrombectomy devices were more beneficial than the distal protection devices.Meta-regression identified gender, receipt of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor, and baseline TIMI flow grade as significant predictors of improved reperfusion across trials. The available clinical trials were individually underpowered and not designed to detect the influence of adjunctive devices on death or MACE.
Conclusions:
Routine use of adjunctive devices cannot be recommended. Thrombus burden, treatment with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors, and gender may modify the reperfusion benefit of adjunctive devices.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
