Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Reduced Complications after Arterial Reconnection in a Rat Model of Orthotopic Liver Transplantation
Published on: November 7, 2020
Outcomes of antifungal prophylaxis in high-risk liver transplant recipients
S Hadley1, C Huckabee, P G Pappas
1Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. susan.hadley@bassett.org
Abstract:
Antifungal prophylaxis for liver transplant recipients (LTRs) is common among patients considered at high risk of infection, but optimal prophylaxis duration and drug has not been defined. This study aimed to assess the effects of 14 days of antifungal therapy prophylaxis in reducing proven invasive fungal infections (IFI) in high-risk subjects. Eligible subjects who met 2 or more risk criteria were randomized 1:1 to the treatment arms (liposomal amphotericin B or fluconazole) and were followed for 100 days post transplantation for evidence of IFI. The study was designed to enroll 300 subjects, but was closed early for insufficient enrollment. A total of 71 subjects were enrolled and randomized. Two-thirds of subjects completed 14 days of study therapy. Ten subjects developed proven or probable IFI with Candida species (9 subjects) and Cryptococcus neoformans (1 subject); rates were similar in the 2 treatment arms. Eleven subjects died, but no death was attributed to study drug or IFI. In summary, high-risk LTRs tolerated antifungal prophylaxis well, and rates of IFI were lower than previously reported in untreated high-risk LTRs.
Insights
Antifungal prophylaxis effectively reduced invasive fungal infections (IFI) in high-risk liver transplant recipients (LTRs). The 14-day treatment was well-tolerated, showing lower IFI rates than in untreated LTRs.
Area of Science:
- Transplantation Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Antifungal prophylaxis is standard for high-risk liver transplant recipients (LTRs).
- Optimal duration and drug choice for antifungal prophylaxis remain undefined.
- Invasive fungal infections (IFI) pose a significant risk to LTRs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of a 14-day antifungal prophylaxis regimen.
- To compare liposomal amphotericin B and fluconazole for IFI prevention in LTRs.
- To assess the safety and tolerability of antifungal prophylaxis in high-risk LTRs.
Main Methods:
- Randomized trial comparing liposomal amphotericin B and fluconazole.
- 14-day antifungal prophylaxis for high-risk LTRs meeting ≥2 risk criteria.
- Follow-up for 100 days post-transplantation to monitor for IFI.
Main Results:
- 71 high-risk LTRs were enrolled; 10 developed proven or probable IFI (Candida, Cryptococcus).
- IFI rates were comparable between the liposomal amphotericin B and fluconazole arms.
- Prophylaxis was well-tolerated, with no deaths attributed to study drug or IFI.
Conclusions:
- 14-day antifungal prophylaxis is well-tolerated in high-risk LTRs.
- This regimen demonstrated lower IFI rates compared to historical untreated LTRs.
- Further research is needed to define optimal prophylaxis strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Cryptococcal Meningitis
Antifungal Agents
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment