Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

09:44
Characterization of a Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strain Derived from Oreochromis spp. Farms Using Whole-Genome Sequencing
Published on: December 23, 2022
Comparison of probe hybridization array typing to multilocus sequence typing for pathogenic Escherichia coli
Sara E McNamara1, Usha Srinivasan, Lixin Zhang
1Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
|January 16, 2009
Summary
A refined Probe Hybridization Array Typing (PHAT) method using 24 virulence genes effectively distinguished Escherichia coli groups similar to MLST clonal groups. This high-throughput approach offers a cost-efficient first-level analysis for large bacterial collections.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Genetics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Probe Hybridization Array Typing (PHAT) is a validated, high-throughput method for genetic material presence/absence detection.
- Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) is a standard for bacterial strain typing, defining clonal groups (CGs).
- There is a need for efficient methods to group bacterial isolates, especially for large-scale studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To refine the PHAT method by developing a probe set targeting virulence genes for classifying Escherichia coli.
- To assess the ability of the refined PHAT probe set to distinguish MLST clonal groups (CGs).
- To evaluate PHAT as a cost- and time-efficient tool for initial analysis of large bacterial collections.
Main Methods:
- A refined PHAT probe set of 24 virulence genes was designed.
- 1,132 Escherichia coli isolates, representing at least 62 MLST CGs, were typed using a "library-on-a-slide" microarray format.
- PHAT classifications were validated against MLST data.
Main Results:
- The 24-probe PHAT set successfully distinguished all 62 MLST CGs in the tested E. coli collection.
- Overall sensitivity and specificity for classifying major CGs were 80.4% and 98.7%, respectively.
- MLST validation of PHAT classification yielded overall sensitivities and specificities of 64.7% and 88.3%, respectively, with variations among individual CGs.
Conclusions:
- The refined PHAT probe set effectively classifies E. coli isolates into groups similar to MLST clonal complexes, suggesting coevolution.
- PHAT is a time- and cost-efficient method suitable for the first level of analysis in large bacterial collections.
- Further refinement of the PHAT probe set is necessary for distinguishing closely related bacterial groups.

