Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (Cf-PWV) to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
Published on: May 3, 2018
Is there any additional prognostic value of central blood pressure wave forms beyond peripheral blood pressure?
Miso Sabovic1, Michel E Safar, Jacques Blacher
1Paris Descartes University, Faculty of Medicine, AP-HP, Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, Diagnosis and Therapeutic Center, Paris, France.
Insights
Central aortic pressure and arterial stiffness offer greater cardiovascular risk prediction than peripheral blood pressure alone. Improving central pressure may reduce cardiovascular events, providing new therapeutic targets.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Hypertension Research
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- Traditionally, peripheral (brachial) blood pressure was the primary focus.
- Emerging evidence highlights the importance of central (aortic) pressure and arterial stiffness.
- Central hemodynamics offer deeper insights into cardiovascular pathophysiology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the pathophysiology and predictive role of central pressure wave forms.
- To explore how central blood pressure influences cardiovascular events.
- To present future perspectives in central hemodynamics research.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of recent interventional trials measuring arterial stiffness and central blood pressure.
- Review of data on the prognostic value of central pressure wave forms.
- Examination of the impact of antihypertensive drugs on central pressure.
Main Results:
- Central pressure wave forms and arterial stiffness provide prognostic information beyond peripheral blood pressure.
- Disparities in cardiovascular events among antihypertensive drugs may relate to their effects on central pressure.
- Improved central blood pressure is linked to reduced cardiovascular events.
Conclusions:
- Central aortic pressure and arterial stiffness are crucial for understanding and managing cardiovascular risk.
- Therapeutic strategies targeting central hemodynamics may improve patient outcomes.
- Further research into central pressure holds promise for advancing cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment.
Abstract:
For a long time the consideration of blood pressure was based exclusively on measurements of peripheral (brachial) blood pressure. However, there is now a growing interest in the investigation of central (aortic) pressure. There is increasing awareness that the central hemodynamics, reflected by central pressure wave forms and arterial stiffness, can provide new and better insight into the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disorders associated with ageing, hypertension, diabetes, as well as end-stage renal disease. Understanding the concept of arterial stiffness, elevated central blood pressure and pulse pressure has given a new view on the mechanisms of target organ damage and their prevention and treatment. Hence, the measurements of arterial stiffness and central blood pressure, and not only peripheral pressure, have been performed in a few recent interventional trials. Not surprisingly, it was found that observed disparity in cardiovascular events obtained by different antihypertensive drugs might be attributed to their diverse effect on central pressure wave forms, despite similar control of peripheral blood pressure. Putting all currently available data together it appears certainly that there is an additional prognostic value of central pressure wave forms beyond peripheral blood pressure. The aim of this article is to provide the pathophysiology and predictive role for cardiovascular events of central pressure wave forms that are beyond peripheral blood pressure. Crucially, we will review data supporting the view that improvement of central blood pressure can result in reduction of cardiovascular events. Lastly, the future perspectives in this exciting and promising field will be presented.
Related Concept Videos
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
