Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

SBAR I: Understanding the Concept01:29

SBAR I: Understanding the Concept

Effective communication among healthcare professionals during hand-off reporting is essential to delivering safe and continuous patient care. Common professional interactions include reports to healthcare team members, hand-off, and transfer reports. Nurses routinely report information to other healthcare team members and also urgently contact healthcare providers to report changes in patient status.
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Unusual Results01:16

Unusual Results

Unusual results are those that have a very low chance of occurring. Unusual results can be identified using probabilities and the range rule of thumb. In problems involving probability, unusual results can be observed in 2 instances – an unusually high number of successes or an unusually low number of successes.
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ  from the mean, μ  is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value = μ + 2σ
Minimum unusual value...
Biostatistics: Overview01:20

Biostatistics: Overview

Biostatistics plays a crucial role in understanding and analyzing data in healthcare and biology. Biostatisticians conduct experiments, gather evidence, and draw meaningful conclusions using statistical methods and techniques. Different variables form the foundation of biostatistical analysis, allowing researchers to understand and interpret data effectively. These variables are classified into different types, each serving a specific purpose in statistical analysis.
Discrete variables are...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Protocol for a SPIRIT extension for reporting Pragmatic and Explanatory trial protocols designed using the PRECIS tool. (SPIRIT-PRECIS).

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Protocol for a CONSORT extension for reporting Pragmatic and Explanatory trials designed using the PRECIS tool. (CONSORT-PRECIS).

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Hospital Policy of Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Transfusion in Major Noncardiac Surgery.

The New England journal of medicine·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence-enabled histological analysis in pre-clinical respiratory disease models: a scoping review.

European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society·2026
Same author

Reconsidering transfusion thresholds in traumatic brain injury with multiple trauma: implications from the HEMOTION sub-study. Author's reply.

Intensive care medicine·2026
Same journal

On the Memoryless Property in Markov Models for NMIBC Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Multi-institutional Assessment of Performance Metrics for MRI-targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Urinary Supersaturation in a Randomized Trial among Individuals with Recurrent Nephrolithiasis comparing Empiric versus Selective Preventive Therapy: The URINE Trial.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

The FDA Should Allow More BCG Strains into the US Market: How Recent Landmark Trials Expose a Regulatory Paradox.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Let's Shift the Focus from Death to Life after Fournier's Gangrene.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Endourology and Nephrolithiasis.

The Journal of urology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Introductory Analysis and Validation of CUT&RUN Sequencing Data
04:58

Introductory Analysis and Validation of CUT&RUN Sequencing Data

Published on: December 13, 2024

Understanding results.

Rodney H Breau1, Philipp Dahm, Dean A Fergusson

  • 1Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

The Journal of Urology
|January 20, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Urologists can better interpret clinical trial results by understanding measures of effect and precision. This knowledge empowers evidence-based practice and accurate assessment of therapeutic benefits and harms.

More Related Videos

The Terroir Concept Interpreted through Grape Berry Metabolomics and Transcriptomics
13:02

The Terroir Concept Interpreted through Grape Berry Metabolomics and Transcriptomics

Published on: October 5, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Introductory Analysis and Validation of CUT&RUN Sequencing Data
04:58

Introductory Analysis and Validation of CUT&RUN Sequencing Data

Published on: December 13, 2024

The Terroir Concept Interpreted through Grape Berry Metabolomics and Transcriptomics
13:02

The Terroir Concept Interpreted through Grape Berry Metabolomics and Transcriptomics

Published on: October 5, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Medical Statistics

Background:

  • Clinical trials are crucial for evaluating therapeutic interventions.
  • Accurate interpretation of trial data is essential for urologists.
  • Understanding statistical measures enhances evidence-based practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To guide urologists in interpreting measures of effect and precision from clinical trials.
  • To enhance the accurate appraisal of therapeutic benefits and harms.
  • To support evidence-based urological practice.

Main Methods:

  • Defining commonly used measures of effect (e.g., risk difference, relative risk).
  • Illustrating statistical generation from clinical trial results.
  • Highlighting the importance of confidence intervals in critical appraisal.

Main Results:

  • Effect measures can be absolute (risk, risk difference, number needed to treat) or relative (relative risk, relative risk reduction).
  • Confidence intervals provide precision estimates and aid in interpreting benefit/harm.
  • Confidence intervals are preferred over p-values for intervention assessment.

Conclusions:

  • Urologists can independently interpret study findings, not solely relying on author conclusions.
  • Understanding effect size and precision is vital for interpreting urological literature.
  • This knowledge facilitates evidence-based clinical decision-making in urology.