Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Relationship Formation

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...

Qualitative Analysis

Qualitative Analysis

Qualitative analysis is the process of identifying elements, ions, or compounds in an unknown sample. It is the first and most fundamental type of analysis based on the hierarchy of analytical goals. This hierarchy is significant as it provides a structured approach to scientific research, with qualitative analysis serving as the initial step, providing essential information before moving on to quantitative or other forms of analysis.
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...

Qualitative Analysis

Qualitative Analysis

For solutions containing mixtures of different cations, the identity of each cation can be determined by qualitative analysis. This technique involves a series of selective precipitations with different chemical reagents, each reaction producing a characteristic precipitate for a specific group of cations. Metal ions within a group are further separated by varying the pH, heating the mixture to redissolve a precipitate, or adding other reagents to form complex ions.
For instance, group IV...

Humanistic Psychology

Humanistic Psychology

Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...

Equity Theory

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...

Impact of Groups on Groups

Impact of Groups on Groups

Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Moral courage efficacy among medical students: associations with environmental professionalism, empathy attitudes, and communication self-efficacy.

Frontiers in medicine·2026

Same author

Breaking bad news with reflective AI virtual experience (BRAVE): development and evaluation of a generative AI-based simulation tool.

Advances in simulation (London, England)·2026

Same author

SUDEP Awareness and Effect on Parental Trauma, Grief, and Coping After the Death of a Child: A Qualitative Investigation.

Neurology·2026

Same author

Human Analysis vs. Artificial Intelligence: Analyzing of Qualitative Medical Students' Narratives.

Qualitative health research·2025

Same author

Values at work.

Communication & medicine·2025

Same author

The associations between resilience, self-care, and burnout among medical students.

PloS one·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

Power relations in qualitative research.

Orit Karnieli-Miller¹, Roni Strier, Liat Pessach

¹University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

Qualitative Health Research

|January 20, 2009

Summary

Qualitative research aims to reduce power imbalances, but this democratization introduces ethical and methodological challenges in clinical settings. This study offers a framework to navigate these complex power dynamics throughout the research process.

Area of Science:

Clinical Research Ethics
Qualitative Inquiry Methodologies
Research Power Dynamics

Background:

Qualitative research paradigms strive to minimize power differentials between researchers and participants.
This approach contrasts with traditional quantitative research, emphasizing participant equality and authenticity.
The democratization inherent in qualitative inquiry presents significant ethical and methodological complexities in clinical research.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the inherent tensions between qualitative research's commitment to power redistribution and ethical/methodological challenges.
To provide a conceptual framework for analyzing and addressing power distribution issues in qualitative clinical research.
To examine ethical and methodological considerations across various stages of the research process.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

Main Methods:

Conceptual analysis of power relations within the qualitative research process.
Developmental analysis of power dynamics from research inception to completion.
Discussion of ethical dilemmas and methodological challenges arising from power redistribution.

Main Results:

The pursuit of reduced power differences in qualitative research creates complex ethical and methodological issues.
Traditional role boundaries in research are challenged, necessitating careful consideration of power dynamics.
A conceptual framework is proposed to guide the management of power distribution throughout the research lifecycle.

Conclusions:

Addressing power distribution is crucial for ethical and methodologically sound qualitative clinical research.
The framework aids in navigating the complexities of democratizing research while upholding ethical standards.
Further examination of ethical and methodological implications is warranted for robust qualitative inquiry.