Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

09:15
Embryo Rescue Protocol for Interspecific Hybridization in Squash
Published on: September 12, 2022
Genes for "Reverse" fruit striping in squash (Cucurbita pepo)
1Department of Vegetable Crops and Plant Genetics, Agricultural Research Organization-Newe Ya'ar Research Center, Ramat Yishay, Israel. hsparis@agri.gov.il
The Journal of Heredity
|January 21, 2009
Summary
Reverse striping in Cucurbita pepo is a genetic trait controlled by a new allele at the light coloration-2 locus. This finding explains the inheritance pattern of this uncommon fruit color variation.
Area of Science:
- Plant genetics
- Fruit morphology
- Cucurbita pepo genetics
Background:
- Longitudinal striping is a common fruit color pattern in Cucurbita pepo.
- Striping is controlled by alleles at the light coloration-1 locus.
- Reverse striping, where stripes are lighter than the background, is a less common variation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To elucidate the mode of inheritance of reverse striping in Cucurbita pepo.
- To identify the genetic factors responsible for reverse striping.
Main Methods:
- Genetic analysis of Cucurbita pepo populations exhibiting reverse striping.
- Phenotypic observation and characterization of fruit striping patterns.
Main Results:
- Reverse striping results from the complementary interaction of a striping allele with a new allele at the light coloration-2 locus, designated l-2(R).
- Homozygosity for l-2(R) in plants with a striping allele leads to completely reversed striping.
- Heterozygosity for l-2(R) results in normal, partially normal, or partially reversed striping.
Conclusions:
- A novel allele, l-2(R), at the light coloration-2 locus is identified as a key factor in reverse striping.
- The interaction between light coloration-1 and light coloration-2 loci determines the manifestation of reverse striping.
- This research clarifies the genetic basis of a unique fruit color pattern in Cucurbita pepo.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Monohybrid Crosses
Overview
Trihybrid Crosses
Trihybrid Crosses
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal chance to...
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal chance to...
Dihybrid Crosses
Overview
Incomplete Dominance
Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.
Test Cross
Alleles are different forms of the same gene. Humans and other diploid organisms inherit two alleles of every gene, one from each parent.
Law of Segregation
When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.

