Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

The Mammary Glands01:12

The Mammary Glands

The female breast is a hemispheric projection of variable size positioned anterior to the pectoralis major and serratus anterior muscles. A fascia layer composed of dense, irregular connective tissue connects it to these muscles.
Each breast features a pigmented projection known as the nipple, through which milk emerges via closely spaced openings of ducts, referred to as lactiferous ducts. Surrounding the nipple is a circular pigmented area of skin named the areola, which appears rough due to...
Cellular Adaptation III: Hyperplasia01:26

Cellular Adaptation III: Hyperplasia

Hyperplasia is an increase in the number of cells in a tissue or organ due to enhanced cell division. It is an adaptive, controlled response to stimuli such as injury, hormones, or stress, involving mitosis to produce genetically identical cells and support tissue repair and regeneration.Tissue CapacityCertain tissues, including the epidermis, intestinal epithelium, bone marrow, and fibroblasts, have a high potential for hyperplasia. Others, such as bone, cartilage, and smooth muscle, show...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quality assurance and ergonomics in the mammography department.

Radiologic technology·2014
Same author

LRRK2 kinase activity and biology are not uniformly predicted by its autophosphorylation and cellular phosphorylation site status.

Frontiers in molecular neuroscience·2014
Same author

Alzheimer disease: focus on computed tomography.

Radiologic technology·2013
Same author

Breast density and digital breast tomosynthesis.

Radiologic technology·2013
Same author

RNF212 is a dosage-sensitive regulator of crossing-over during mammalian meiosis.

Nature genetics·2013
Same author

The fractured femur.

Radiologic technology·2013
Same journal

An Intentional and Ethical Integration of AI in Medical Imaging.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

Benefits of Integrating AI Into Computer-Aided Detection Systems.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

Using Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Analysis of Chest Computed Tomography.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

A Practice-Aligned Approach to Integrating AI in Radiation Sciences Education.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

Site Visitors: The Unsung Heroes of the Accreditation Process.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

Extended Reality Innovations in Medical Imaging Education.

Radiologic technology·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
06:03

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis

Published on: February 6, 2020

The augmented breast.

April Reynolds1

  • 1University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Radiologic Technology
|January 21, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review examines how medical professionals can effectively screen and diagnose breast conditions in patients who have undergone breast augmentation surgery. It covers the specific challenges these implants pose for standard imaging, the various types of implants available, and how to accurately interpret mammograms in this population.

Keywords:
radiologybreast diseasediagnostic imagingsurgical oncology

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
13:35

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
06:03

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis

Published on: February 6, 2020

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
13:35

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Radiology and diagnostic imaging within augmented breast clinical practice
  • Surgical oncology and reconstructive medicine

Background:

Prior research has shown that the presence of prosthetic devices complicates standard radiological screening procedures. That uncertainty drove clinicians to seek specialized protocols for evaluating soft tissue health in these individuals. No prior work had fully resolved the diagnostic limitations inherent in traditional mammographic views for augmented patients. This gap motivated a comprehensive assessment of current imaging standards. It was already known that implant placement affects tissue visibility during routine examinations. Investigators recognized that standard compression techniques might be insufficient or potentially hazardous for these specific patients. Clinicians required clearer guidance on navigating the anatomical changes induced by surgical enhancement. This review addresses the persistent need for standardized reporting and improved detection accuracy in this unique clinical demographic.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of imaging techniques for patients with augmented breasts. The authors seek to address the specific diagnostic challenges posed by the presence of prosthetic devices. They intend to clarify how different surgical implantation methods influence the visibility of breast tissue during screening. This study explores the utility of various imaging modalities beyond standard mammography for detecting potential disease. The researchers aim to synthesize existing knowledge on breast pathology within this unique patient population. They want to establish a clear framework for accurate mammographic reporting in the context of breast augmentation. This work addresses the need for improved clinical guidance to support better diagnostic outcomes. The authors strive to offer a practical resource for radiologists navigating these complex anatomical scenarios.

Main Methods:

Review Approach involved a systematic synthesis of existing literature regarding radiological practices for augmented breasts. The authors evaluated diverse diagnostic modalities beyond traditional X-ray screening to determine their efficacy. They analyzed clinical data concerning various surgical insertion methods and their impact on subsequent tissue visualization. This investigation utilized established guidelines to assess how different prosthetic materials affect image quality. The team examined peer-reviewed studies to identify best practices for patient positioning during examinations. They synthesized information on reporting standards to ensure consistent communication among medical professionals. The study design focused on comparing various screening strategies to address known diagnostic limitations. This comprehensive analysis provides a structured overview of current clinical recommendations for this patient group.

Main Results:

Key Findings From the Literature indicate that prosthetic devices significantly reduce the sensitivity of standard screening mammography. The authors report that specific positioning maneuvers can improve the visualization of breast tissue by displacing the implant. Their review demonstrates that silicone and saline implants present unique challenges due to their varying radiodensity. The literature suggests that ultrasound is a valuable secondary tool for evaluating suspected abnormalities in augmented patients. Findings show that magnetic resonance imaging provides superior detail when mammographic results remain inconclusive. The researchers note that standardized reporting formats correlate with higher diagnostic accuracy across clinical settings. Data indicates that surgical history is a primary determinant in choosing the most effective imaging pathway. The review confirms that tailored protocols are required to overcome the inherent limitations of standard diagnostic procedures.

Conclusions:

Synthesis and Implications suggest that specialized imaging protocols remain necessary for accurate disease detection in augmented patients. The authors emphasize that understanding implant placement is vital for optimizing mammographic sensitivity. Their review highlights that radiologists must adapt standard positioning to minimize tissue obscuration. Evidence indicates that combining mammography with alternative modalities improves diagnostic outcomes for these individuals. The researchers propose that standardized reporting terminology helps reduce confusion during clinical interpretation. Their synthesis confirms that surgical history influences the selection of appropriate screening tools. The authors conclude that ongoing education regarding implant types supports better patient care. This summary implies that tailored diagnostic strategies are essential for maintaining high screening standards in this population.

The authors propose that standard mammographic views often obscure breast tissue, necessitating specialized positioning techniques. Unlike non-augmented patients, those with implants require modified compression to ensure both safety and diagnostic clarity during routine screening.

The researchers identify various implant materials, including saline and silicone, as key factors. These different substances possess distinct radiodensity profiles, which influence how clinicians interpret imaging results compared to natural glandular tissue.

The authors state that specific surgical placement, such as subpectoral or subglandular, is necessary to understand. This anatomical knowledge allows technicians to adjust imaging angles, whereas standard approaches fail to account for these distinct surgical configurations.

The researchers note that mammographic reporting serves as a critical data type. This structured documentation helps clinicians distinguish between implant-related artifacts and potential pathologies, unlike unstructured notes which often lead to diagnostic ambiguity.

The authors describe the phenomenon of implant rupture as a significant measurement challenge. They compare this to capsular contracture, noting that both conditions require distinct imaging modalities for accurate identification and clinical management.

The authors propose that integrating alternative imaging modalities, such as ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging, is necessary. They contrast this with relying solely on mammography, which may miss subtle lesions hidden by the prosthetic device.