Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Critical Thinking I01:24

Critical Thinking I

Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career with...
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory01:20

Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory

Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...
Patient-centered Care01:13

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level01:16

Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level

The critical region, critical value, and significance level are interdependent concepts crucial in hypothesis testing.
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in  probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the test...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Virtual Care of Acute Diverticulitis: A Phase I/II Randomised Clinical Feasibility Trial.

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same author

'Everyone has their own way-there's no protocol'. An Australian qualitative study of clinician perspectives on the management of low anterior resection syndrome.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2026
Same author

Standardization before radicality: Current evidence for complete mesocolic excision.

Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract·2026
Same author

The rheological properties of <i>Candida albicans</i> colony biofilms are impacted by matrix production and cell wall structure.

Biofilm·2026
Same author

Presacral tumours: international consensus on diagnosis and management.

The British journal of surgery·2026
Same author

Conversion counts: Interpreting real-world outcomes by operative approach in rectal cancer surgery.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2026
Same journal

Proteomic and metabolic prediction of response to therapy in gastrointestinal cancers.

Nature clinical practice. Gastroenterology & hepatology·2009
Same journal

A perfect storm.

Nature clinical practice. Gastroenterology & hepatology·2009
Same journal

Gastric electric stimulation is a viable option in gastroparesis treatment.

Nature clinical practice. Gastroenterology & hepatology·2009
Same journal

Misconception of treatment for liver disease unique to pregnancy.

Nature clinical practice. Gastroenterology & hepatology·2009
Same journal

Probiotic prophylaxis in acute pancreatitis: prudence required.

Nature clinical practice. Gastroenterology & hepatology·2009
Same journal

Duration of treatment with albendazole for hepatic toxocariasis.

Nature clinical practice. Gastroenterology & hepatology·2009
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

How to critically appraise an article.

Jane M Young1, Michael J Solomon

  • 1Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia. jyoung@email.cs.nsw.gov.au

Nature Clinical Practice. Gastroenterology & Hepatology
|January 21, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review offers a 10-step guide to critical appraisal, helping clinicians evaluate research quality. It focuses on identifying strengths and weaknesses in studies to ensure valid clinical practice decisions.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research Methodology
  • Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

  • Critical appraisal is essential for evaluating research validity and usefulness.
  • Assessing study design, methodology, and statistical analysis are key components.
  • Relevance to clinical practice and potential conflicts of interest also require consideration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a systematic 10-step guide for critical appraisal of research articles.
  • To assist clinicians in identifying high-quality studies for clinical practice.
  • To enhance the ability of healthcare professionals to evaluate research findings.

Main Methods:

  • The review outlines a structured 10-step process for critical appraisal.
  • Emphasis is placed on evaluating study design appropriateness and methodological rigor.
  • Includes assessment of statistical methods, interpretation, conflicts of interest, and clinical relevance.

Main Results:

  • A comprehensive 10-step guide is provided for conducting critical appraisals.
  • The guide facilitates the identification of robust and relevant research.
  • Clinicians can systematically assess the strengths and weaknesses of research.

Conclusions:

  • Effective critical appraisal is crucial for evidence-based clinical practice.
  • The 10-step guide offers a practical framework for clinicians.
  • Adopting this systematic approach improves the utilization of high-quality research findings.