Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Use of an Influenza Antigen Microarray to Measure the Breadth of Serum Antibodies Across Virus Subtypes
Published on: July 26, 2019
Expert judgments of pandemic influenza risks
W Bruine De Bruin1, B Fischhoff, L Brilliant
1Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. wandi@cmu.edu
Medical and non-medical experts predict severe H5N1 pandemic casualties. Medical experts foresee a 15% chance of human transmission within 3 years, with limited vaccine or antiviral response, prioritizing surveillance. Non-experts were more optimistic about transmission and countermeasures.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Public Health
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Pandemic influenza, particularly H5N1 avian influenza, poses a significant global health threat.
- Expert opinion is crucial for assessing pandemic risks and planning mitigation strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare expert judgments on key variables influencing a potential H5N1 pandemic.
- To understand differing perspectives between medical and non-medical experts regarding pandemic influenza.
Main Methods:
- Structured surveys administered to 19 medical experts and 17 non-medical experts.
- Quantitative judgments collected on transmission, countermeasures, and casualty predictions.
- Qualitative data gathered through open-ended questions to explore underlying beliefs.
Main Results:
- Medical experts estimated a 15% median chance of efficient H5N1 human-to-human transmission within 3 years, with low confidence in vaccine/antiviral availability.
- Non-medical experts perceived higher probabilities for transmission and effective countermeasures compared to medical experts.
- Both groups predicted severe casualties if transmission occurred, with medical experts favoring surveillance as a key mitigation strategy.
Conclusions:
- Divergent expert perceptions exist regarding H5N1 pandemic risk and response effectiveness.
- Despite differing views on countermeasures, both expert groups shared grave concerns about potential H5N1 pandemic outcomes.
- Further research into expert risk perception and communication strategies is warranted for pandemic preparedness.
Related Concept Videos
Influenza
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Relative Risk
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin create...
Infectious Diseases and Their Occurrence
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

